We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Return to sender charge
Comments
-
thriftymanc wrote: »Wouldn't they be able to tell by the date on the stamp? If it had only just been posted, there wouldn't have been enough time for it to get to the recipient, repacked and put back into the post.
date on what stamp?
If you mean franking,if its the 2nd time the stamp is used then the date means nothing.0 -
I believe thriftymanc is referring to APL.0
-
thriftymanc wrote: »I did say in the post you quoted that I was referring to the 'stamp', or label, that the Post Office print. I called it 'stamp' as that's what the OP's calling it. They're printed out with dates on aren't they?
Yup but for an APL to be chargable it would need the date removed.
Alongside the paid postage.
Which wouldnt really leave any APL.
IME APL items are straight through items.
It is assumed the postage paid is correct by revenue protection.
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=68945451&postcount=12
If you look at this post. The figures make it seem like a large letter with a stamp.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards