Return to sender charge

custardy

thriftymanc wrote: »

Wouldn't they be able to tell by the date on the stamp? If it had only just been posted, there wouldn't have been enough time for it to get to the recipient, repacked and put back into the post.

date on what stamp?
If you mean franking,if its the 2nd time the stamp is used then the date means nothing.

molerat

I believe thriftymanc is referring to APL.

custardy

thriftymanc wrote: »

I did say in the post you quoted that I was referring to the 'stamp', or label, that the Post Office print. I called it 'stamp' as that's what the OP's calling it. They're printed out with dates on aren't they?

Yup but for an APL to be chargable it would need the date removed.
Alongside the paid postage.
Which wouldnt really leave any APL.
IME APL items are straight through items.
It is assumed the postage paid is correct by revenue protection.

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=68945451&postcount=12

If you look at this post. The figures make it seem like a large letter with a stamp.