We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Step Change for compulsary savings

Joe_Bloggs
Posts: 4,535 Forumite
The excellent StepChange advice charity are advocating a compulsory savings initiative,
http://www.stepchange.org/Mediacentre/Pressreleases/Autoenrolmentsavingscrisis.aspx
J_B.
Perhaps the coffers of the unsaved should get a quantitative easing bonus.
http://www.stepchange.org/Mediacentre/Pressreleases/Autoenrolmentsavingscrisis.aspx
J_B.
Perhaps the coffers of the unsaved should get a quantitative easing bonus.
0
Comments
-
How bizarre. StepChange may well be excellent, but some of their people clearly have too much time on their hands.0
-
Unfortunately there is only so much you can do - probably better to educate people rather than make it compulsory. However some people decide to pay out for a new car (for example) rather than build up savings and then come unstuck so not sure how they can be helped unless there is some form of compulsion.
Problem is even if compulsory once the savings are there, who decides what is appropriate to use them for?
Edit - Having read the link I have absolutely no idea what this means "A significant proportion of households (between 8% and 13%) engage with behaviour that does not prioritise long term financial advantage."
Spend all their money down the pub? Would have been more useful to explain what this behaviour is.Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0 -
jimjames edited :-Edit - Having read the link I have absolutely no idea what this means "A significant proportion of households (between 8% and 13%) engage with behaviour that does not prioritise long term financial advantage."
Employer matched saving incentives are suggested. Bounded rationality is considered worthy of blame for non savers.
Existing high interest debts are an excuse for avoiding long term precautionary low interest saving. This suggests the chicken and egg scenario of not having to borrow money if you had savings in the first place.
J_B.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards