We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Step Change for compulsary savings

The excellent StepChange advice charity are advocating a compulsory savings initiative,
http://www.stepchange.org/Mediacentre/Pressreleases/Autoenrolmentsavingscrisis.aspx

J_B.

Perhaps the coffers of the unsaved should get a quantitative easing bonus.

Comments

  • agrinnall
    agrinnall Posts: 23,344 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    How bizarre. StepChange may well be excellent, but some of their people clearly have too much time on their hands.
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 18,797 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 7 August 2015 at 12:36PM
    Unfortunately there is only so much you can do - probably better to educate people rather than make it compulsory. However some people decide to pay out for a new car (for example) rather than build up savings and then come unstuck so not sure how they can be helped unless there is some form of compulsion.

    Problem is even if compulsory once the savings are there, who decides what is appropriate to use them for?

    Edit - Having read the link I have absolutely no idea what this means "A significant proportion of households (between 8% and 13%) engage with behaviour that does not prioritise long term financial advantage."

    Spend all their money down the pub? Would have been more useful to explain what this behaviour is.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • Joe_Bloggs
    Joe_Bloggs Posts: 4,535 Forumite
    jimjames edited :-
    Edit - Having read the link I have absolutely no idea what this means "A significant proportion of households (between 8% and 13%) engage with behaviour that does not prioritise long term financial advantage."
    There is a link on the linked page to a 51 page discussion paper.
    Employer matched saving incentives are suggested. Bounded rationality is considered worthy of blame for non savers.

    Existing high interest debts are an excuse for avoiding long term precautionary low interest saving. This suggests the chicken and egg scenario of not having to borrow money if you had savings in the first place.

    J_B.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.