We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

New SSD confusion!

Options
esuhl
esuhl Posts: 9,409 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
I'm thinking about getting an SSD for my PC. I've seen some amazingly fast SSDs that connect via PCIe, but I'm a bit confused as to whether I'd be able to boot from one, and what speeds I'd be able to achieve.

I want something really fast, but there's no point buying something faster than the PC can cope with! (Although, having said that, the PC is 6 years old already, so I might move the SSD to a faster motherboard in a few more years.)

The motherboard I have is the Asus P6T SE, and I have spare x4 and x16 PCIe v2.0 sockets. It has four SATA II sockets as well, although none are spare. I'd have to get a bigger hard drive to replace two existing drives to make room for a SATA SSD.

Anyway... am I right in thinking that I wouldn't be able to boot from a PCIe SSD as the motherboard (presumably?) isn't NVMe-aware?

Could I get a PCIe SSD and use the MBR on a mechanical hard drive to boot the SSD? Or should I just stick to a SATA II SSD?

I'll need at least 300GB (and probably can't afford more than 500GB) if anyone has any recommendations...?
«13

Comments

  • enfield_freddy
    enfield_freddy Posts: 6,147 Forumite
    ssd drives are sata 3 , but are compatable with sata 2 ,


    there are several proggys , (free of charge) that will clone your drive , to ssd specs


    you could remove an optical drive and use the cable to achieve this ,


    you do not state the size of your other 2 drives , what are they? , as a large (1t) drive is reasonably priced those days
  • Fightsback
    Fightsback Posts: 2,504 Forumite
    edited 29 July 2015 at 12:24AM
    esuhl wrote: »
    I'm thinking about getting an SSD for my PC. I've seen some amazingly fast SSDs that connect via PCIe, but I'm a bit confused as to whether I'd be able to boot from one, and what speeds I'd be able to achieve.

    I want something really fast, but there's no point buying something faster than the PC can cope with! (Although, having said that, the PC is 6 years old already, so I might move the SSD to a faster motherboard in a few more years.)

    The motherboard I have is the Asus P6T SE, and I have spare x4 and x16 PCIe v2.0 sockets. It has four SATA II sockets as well, although none are spare. I'd have to get a bigger hard drive to replace two existing drives to make room for a SATA SSD.

    Anyway... am I right in thinking that I wouldn't be able to boot from a PCIe SSD as the motherboard (presumably?) isn't NVMe-aware?

    Could I get a PCIe SSD and use the MBR on a mechanical hard drive to boot the SSD? Or should I just stick to a SATA II SSD?

    I'll need at least 300GB (and probably can't afford more than 500GB) if anyone has any recommendations...?

    See article here:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/28/review_kingston_hyperx_predator_hhhl_480gb_pcie_ssd/
    Science isn't exact, it's only confidence within limits.
  • S0litaire
    S0litaire Posts: 3,535 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    You can boot from those pcie ssd cards. The motherboard just sees it as another hard drive!

    But they can be expensive!

    Also might be best to do a clean install it going from a hard disk to an ssd as their are a few differences between how the OS handles the ssd compared to a hard disk.
    Laters

    Sol

    "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
  • enfield_freddy
    enfield_freddy Posts: 6,147 Forumite
    I have a 128g M.2 card in my nuc 513 , as boot drive , they (sandisk etc) seem faster than an average ssd drive ,
  • Fightsback
    Fightsback Posts: 2,504 Forumite
    S0litaire wrote: »
    You can boot from those pcie ssd cards. The motherboard just sees it as another hard drive!

    But they can be expensive!

    Also might be best to do a clean install it going from a hard disk to an ssd as their are a few differences between how the OS handles the ssd compared to a hard disk.

    Much easier to do the necessary tweaks than the rigmarole of a full install and a bit overkill. I'd agree if it were an OS upgrade.
    Science isn't exact, it's only confidence within limits.
  • enfield_freddy
    enfield_freddy Posts: 6,147 Forumite
    agreed with fightsback , just clone the drive , (after cleaning and defragging)


    mini tool partition (free) inc a setting for cloning from a NON SSD drive to a SSD drive , live whilst running windows
  • S0litaire
    S0litaire Posts: 3,535 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Fightsback wrote: »
    Much easier to do the necessary tweaks than the rigmarole of a full install and a bit overkill. I'd agree if it were an OS upgrade.

    In the past I've done the straight image between disk and ssd and even after the tweaks it just never ran right, had problems with trim, had to keep doing it manually as the settings never seemed to kick in!

    But might just have been me! And i think a clean sweep is good every now and again... ;)
    Laters

    Sol

    "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
  • esuhl
    esuhl Posts: 9,409 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 29 July 2015 at 1:48AM
    you could remove an optical drive and use the cable to achieve this ,

    Ah, the optical drive is connected via IDE (as is yet another hard drive!).
    you do not state the size of your other 2 drives , what are they? , as a large (1t) drive is reasonably priced those days

    Well, it's not really important, but my current drive layout is as follows:

    1TB SATA drive:
    NTFS - Windows XP (100GB)
    ext3 - Linux root (75GB)
    NTFS - Windows 7 (250GB)
    ext2 - Linux /boot (64MB)
    ext3 - Linux /home (75GB)
    NTFS - Data (420GB)
    FAT32 - Data (12GB)
    swap - Linux swap (512MB)

    300GB SATA drive:
    NTFS - Data (100GB)
    NTFS - Music (25GB)
    NTFS - Video (175GB)

    60GB IDE drive:
    NTFS - Data (60GB)

    300GB SATA drive:
    NTFS - Backup1 (300GB)

    300GB SATA drive:
    NTFS - Backup2 (300GB)

    DVD+/-RW IDE drive
    Fightsback wrote: »

    Exactly the kind of thing I was looking at! :D Will it take much of a speed hit if I stick it in a PCIe v2.0 slot instead of a v3.0 one?

    Will I definitely be able to boot from it using my old motherboard?
    S0litaire wrote: »
    You can boot from those pcie ssd cards. The motherboard just sees it as another hard drive!

    I just want to make absolutely sure, but... are you sure my old motherboard will be able to boot from it? How would my BIOS "see" the drive? What option would appear in the boot selection settings? (Not that I don't trust you -- I just want to make sure!)
    Fightsback wrote: »
    Much easier to do the necessary tweaks than the rigmarole of a full install and a bit overkill. I'd agree if it were an OS upgrade.

    I currently run 3 OSes:
    1. Windows XP for a few legacy apps (so easy enough to reinstall).
    2. Windows 7 (which has become unfathomably bloated and needs a reinstall anyway). I might upgrade to Windows 10 on the HDD then use the Win10 ISO to create a clean installation on the SSD.
    3. Arch Linux (which has been tweaked and customised and I definitely don't want to reinstall -- I'll move the partitions with a cloning app!)
    Anyway, if I can boot from one of those PCIe cards, that definitely seems to be the way to go for blisteringly-fast performance.
  • I_have_spoken
    I_have_spoken Posts: 5,051 Forumite
    edited 29 July 2015 at 8:21AM
    I use one of these - http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00J69VM8A - as my boot drive, it's recognised by the BIOS on start-up and boots Windows 7 64bit fine.

    Get around 325MB/sec on write, 350MB/sec read by ATTO Benchmark
  • Stoke
    Stoke Posts: 3,182 Forumite
    Any SSD will improve your performance, even a cheap one. My point in the other thread, mechanical and software bottlenecks. Mechanical HDD are bottlenecked by physics, SSD's are much faster.

    Use a SSD as primary, and a HDD as a secondary and you'll be laughing.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.