Received this from popla !

chrisjose1913

Dear Sir or Madam

Following the Court of Appeal judgment in ParkingEye Limited -v- Beavis (a copy of which can be viewed on the POPLA website) a further appeal has now been filed at the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.

Where there is a specific application for an adjournment or where it appears, or has already appeared, to the Assessor that there is no other issue upon which the appeal could be determined, POPLA cases will be adjourned pending a decision of the Supreme Court. There is currently no date fixed at the Supreme Court but the Registry have indicated that the matter will not be heard before the end of July 2016 and judgment will then be reserved. However, the Appellant has indicated they will seek to have the matter linked with another case due for hearing later this year.

Accordingly, your case will now be adjourned to a provisional date for determination of Monday 9 November 2015. The position should become clearer in the next few weeks, when the matter will be reviewed.






I am worried about this " Assessor that there is no other issue upon which the appeal could be determined" this worries me because this could mean my defense only now relies on case law.

waamo

Without seeing your original appeal comment is difficult. I'm guessing GPEOL is in it? This letter is routinly sent out to appeals that contain GPEOL.

If your appeal contained other points POPLA will asses those too.

If you have a thread already running this would have been better posted in it so people can refer back to what has already happened.

The_Deep

this worries me because this could mean my defense only now relies on case law.

Was your defence based soley on loss, did you not mention contract, (standing), and signage?

Mike172

Assume this is with Parking Eye....

I still submit appeals with GPEOL at the top (and bout 5 other appeals below) but thats to UKCPM and they have hearing dates of within about 1-2 months.

hoohoo

POPLA seem to be sending this out now to all cases that mention GPEOL, whether or not other circumstances can actually determine the case. For instance, even if the NTK is blatantly non-compliant, or there is no valid landowner authority, these letters are going out.