rejected appeal to VCS for stopping at liverpool airport

bazster

Guys_Dad wrote: »

The bye laws are the secondary point. Admitting to being passenger and having a witness puts real pressure on the "Please note that we are proceeding on the reasonable assumption that you were the driver of the vehicle on the date in question unless you are able to prove the contrary." point in the VCS rejection.

As I see quite often wives dropping husbands off at the station to commute to London, such an assumption supported by the IAS is just toot and I would love to see a court overturn an IAS appeal slating them for their clearly biased assumptions.

How much longer can the IAS (Gladstones) get away with their crazy distortion?

I agree completely.

bazster

Guys_Dad wrote: »

You know that I don't disagree with you, however the IAS and IPC members can argue with opinions and if the PPC is following the IPC AoS/code the IAS is not going to agree with any appeal based on signage unless it is blatantly clear to a blind man that it is deficient.

And I agree with you, I'm just pointing out to the OP that, however strong his position is, Skippy the IAS assessor will find a way of ignoring it, belittling it or declaring it irrelevant.

cavitee

thank you all for your time and advice. I will be appealing to the IAS and will expect to hear a rejection to follow. On following the instructions on how to appeal it seems the IAS website makes you fill out lots of personal details. Is this usual? Are there any pitfalls by filling these out?

ideally i wanted to post these via recorded mail. what would you guys suggest?

waamo

Do not use recorded mail it's a waste of money. Use ordinary first class with a free proof of posting.

esmerobbo

"The roadway in question is part of a high security zone"

No matter how many times I see that it make me smile. It was actually a police inspector who made that quote when the local paper asked him what his thoughts were on these charges. VCS loved it.

I emailed the said inspector and asked him what he thought of the other 3 miles of road around the airport not under VCS's control, and what he did to ensure security on these roads. 18 months later still waiting a response.

cavitee

looks like they only accept online appeals now

bod1467

cavitee wrote: »

looks like they only accept online appeals now

Really? So they're discriminating against the technologically-disadvantaged? Not everyone is comfortable (or even able) to use online methods of communication.