PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Enforcement of Restrictive Covenents

2»

Comments

  • Land_Registry
    Land_Registry Posts: 6,168 Organisation Representative
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    purdita wrote: »
    Hi
    Is there any way of finding who now owns the covenant when the original holder went into liquidation several years ago?
    We are buying a bungalow built in 1939 with a restrictive covenant preventing any development outside of the building line and no sheds etc.
    Most of the houses on the street have been extended and we want to do the same and build a double garage in the front garden.
    The Land Registry title still refers to the original developer but could the covenants have been sold on to someone else?
    Thanks

    Purdita - covenants are not sold on but run with the land in most cases. As such the benefit is probably now with each landowner with property which formed part of the original development. The company would only have the same benefit if they still owned land which had also been part of that same development.
    Official Company Representative
    I am the official company representative of Land Registry. MSE has given permission for me to post in response to queries about the company, so that I can help solve issues. You can see my name on the companies with permission to post list. I am not allowed to tout for business at all. If you believe I am please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com This does NOT imply any form of approval of my company or its products by MSE"
  • princeofpounds
    princeofpounds Posts: 10,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You may be able to buy a single premium indemnity policy which will cover you if the covenantee seeks damages against you.


    No-one is going to be awarded damages for a hip-high hedge! At the very very very most there would be an injunction for removal.


    If there are other enclosures in the area that haven't been challenged for a very long time, I'd get on with it as the likelihood is no-one will care at all.


    It's not like it's a law or anything, so as long as you are prepared to remove it if necessary it's not a problem.


    Do you suspect that it is going to cause particular offence if you do put it up?
  • purdita
    purdita Posts: 3,003 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Purdita - covenants are not sold on but run with the land in most cases. As such the benefit is probably now with each landowner with property which formed part of the original development. The company would only have the same benefit if they still owned land which had also been part of that same development.

    I've been informed that the covenants were bought up by someone who also purchased an undeveloped wooded area which would have formed part of the original land sold off in the 1930's. So I guess this means he still has a benefit. The local council fairly recently requested he cut back trees which were dangerously overhanging the road.
    He complied with this so is obviously still around.
    Would we be best advised to try to take out some kind of indemnity insurance?
    I have been researching online and saw that a white paper was submitted several years ago suggesting that any covenants over 80 yrs old should be made obsolete. This would affect ours in 3 years time. Does anyone know if this was ever implemented?
    My husband says he will leave me if I don't stop shopping......... God I will miss that man.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.