Robinson Way - CCJ unpaid and Bailiffs visiting

skyshadow

fatbelly wrote: »

£600 minimum?

Yeah normally I use the HCEO when enforcing any judgements, this was such a low amount so sadly it's only bailiffs. While bailiffs don't have as much clout as HCEO visiting an office with computers and staff and a public reception area they have quite a few options open for taking walking possession of goods, there is also consideration that if RW continue to ignore this (which as of yesterday they still have) then bailiffs enforcement fees get added to the debt.

Overall it will cost them more to attempt to set aside the judgement in fees and management time than just paying it and chalking it up to poor internal management.

Regardless of the above this is hardly an advert for using them as a company when they can't manage any debts that come to them and they themselves let debts get to the stage of bailiff visits.

chanz4

Can stop the issue really easy then counter claim against the op

skyshadow

chanz4 wrote: »

Can stop the issue really easy then counter claim against the op

What would they issue a counter claim for, being ignorant of invoices sent? If that were true every debtor in the world would counter claim against creditors.

skyshadow

Bailiff just attended today and after some huffing and puffing and claiming they don't know what this debt is for, didn't get the letters/emails, wasn't valid and lots of other rubbish they paid in full.

Oh the irony of being a victim of your own business model and suffering the same consequences that you warn will happen to people if they ignore their debts.

Practise what you preach in future chumps!

fatbelly

There's a new series of The Sheriffs are Coming starting soon. Wouldn't it be brilliant if it feaured the HCEOs raiding the offices of Robinson Way, Mackenzie Hall, Buchanan Clark & Wells, Capquest...

I'd watch that

skyshadow

Just created a blog with my first post about this thread here which goes into more detail.

If you've got a commute with 15 minutes to spare then have a read if you've not stumbled across this thread before.
https://thedebtdefendersorguk.wordpress.com/2015/09/27/practise-what-you-preach/

rizla_king

chanz4 wrote: »

bet they don't pay, court baliffs don't have much power

Bet lost

fatbelly wrote: »

Against a business loaded with computers? It did cross my mind that the op could do a 3rd party debt order and freeze their main account. But the court bailiff will collect here I think, unless RW do decide to try set aside and defend the claim.

yes

skyshadow wrote: »

Bailiff just attended today and after some huffing and puffing and claiming they don't know what this debt is for, didn't get the letters/emails, wasn't valid and lots of other rubbish they paid in full.

would love to have seen that!

skyshadow

rizla_king wrote: »

Bet lost



yes



would love to have seen that!

Ahha that bet lost comment floored me.

rizla_king

skyshadow wrote: »

Ahha that bet lost comment floored me.

You should see the other rubbish they come out with!