We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Deposit Scheme Adjudication
wildheart83
Posts: 859 Forumite
I moved out of a property a while ago and the LL/LA have claimed for damage caused. I disputed it, and submitted an electronic copy of the inventory showing the damaged item in question (photo dated prior to my lease starting) and also an email to the LA detailing the damage.
It went to adjudication and they've sided in part with the LL/LA over the damage.
Is it worth me taking to a review, or do I just go to small claims over this? Does anyone have any experience of going to review, or advice they could give?
I wouldn't be so annoyed if I had caused the damage but I know I didn't, and thought I had shown enough to prove it.
It went to adjudication and they've sided in part with the LL/LA over the damage.
Is it worth me taking to a review, or do I just go to small claims over this? Does anyone have any experience of going to review, or advice they could give?
I wouldn't be so annoyed if I had caused the damage but I know I didn't, and thought I had shown enough to prove it.
Feb 2024:
CC1 6537.66
CC2 7804.45
CC3 4221.17
CC4 2053.68
CC5 989.30
Loan 1 3686.44
Loan 2 5275.22
Total £30,567.92
CC1 6537.66
CC2 7804.45
CC3 4221.17
CC4 2053.68
CC5 989.30
Loan 1 3686.44
Loan 2 5275.22
Total £30,567.92
0
Comments
-
I asked for a review of my case, it was rejected but there seems to be some mistakes in their response. (They note the absence of a invoice for professional cleaning despite my contract not mentioning this). They also have ignored points I made in both my initial evidence and review request, I get the feeling that each case is only ever very briefly looked over. However, I don't think small claims would be worth it considering you've already been through adjudication.0
-
Did you damage the item ?I do Contracts, all day every day.0
-
Read the OPwildheart83 wrote: »I wouldn't be so annoyed if I had caused the damage but I know I didn't, and thought I had shown enough to prove it.0 -
Marktheshark wrote: »Did you damage the item ?wildheart83 wrote: »I wouldn't be so annoyed if I had caused the damage but I know I didn't, and thought I had shown enough to prove it.
It doesn't sound like the OP did damage the item.
How much of a deduction are we talking about here? I know that since you haven't damaged the item then nothing should be deducted but sometimes it's just not worth the hassle however unfair that might be.0 -
They are asking to deduct 20% of the deposit.
I didn't damage the item. I feel like I did everything properly and the LA are just at it. This is the same company who refused to fix the boiler because it was too close to Christmas and the LL apparently had more important things to pay for.Feb 2024:
CC1 6537.66
CC2 7804.45
CC3 4221.17
CC4 2053.68
CC5 989.30
Loan 1 3686.44
Loan 2 5275.22
Total £30,567.920 -
B*stards. For a 20% deduction then if I could take it further then I probably would. The risk with going to small claims is that if you lose you might end up having to foot the other side's legal costs.0
-
That's why I'm hesitant about what to do next. Their inventory shows it's broken, the photo is clear and clearly dated, their "evidence" is a black & white copy of a photo that you can't see at all, plus my email saying "hello, this is broken can you fix it please?" doesn't seem to be good enough. I don't know what to do nowFeb 2024:
CC1 6537.66
CC2 7804.45
CC3 4221.17
CC4 2053.68
CC5 989.30
Loan 1 3686.44
Loan 2 5275.22
Total £30,567.920 -
What is the item and it's value? How much are they proposing deducting?0
-
What was their justification in awarding against you?0
-
It's a part for a cooker that was never used by me (cause it was broken) I don't know of its value but they wanted £122 to replace it.
Their justification is that they are satisfied that the item was in a worse condition at the end of the tenancy than it was at the start, although they acknowledge that I followed the correct procedure by emailing the LA to notify them of the damage within the 5 working days they stated.
I spoke to a much more helpful person at the deposit scheme, and I'm trying to speak to Citizens Advice to see how best to word the review. I'm stuck as to whether they erred in fact or in law (or both)Feb 2024:
CC1 6537.66
CC2 7804.45
CC3 4221.17
CC4 2053.68
CC5 989.30
Loan 1 3686.44
Loan 2 5275.22
Total £30,567.920
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards