We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

I need a car. Any ideas!!

2»

Comments

  • anewman
    anewman Posts: 9,200 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    A Skoda Felicia 1.3 would fit the bill in all but age, as the last ones were made in 2000. They are usually reliable, cheap to buy, good MPG, 5 doors. Probably among the most roomiest 1.3's around.

    Why get a loan when you can get a good reliable car for under £1000 very easily.

    For example

    http://atsearch.autotrader.co.uk/www/CARS_popup.jsp?nU=0&make=SKODA&model=FELICIA&min_pr=&max_pr=1000&modelexact=1&photo=1&hassearched=Y&start=3&distance=38&adcategory=CARS&channel=CARS&id=200731106258458

    Parts for these Skoda's are relatively cheap. There's even a guy on ebay who specialises in Skoda parts so if you know what you want you can buy there and ask garage to sort it.
  • ixwood
    ixwood Posts: 2,550 Forumite
    Quite often these days, cars are built with the same engine and electonically controlled/limited. These can be easily changed by garages/tuners. i.e. you could buy a 90bhp car and get it remapped to 110 or 120bhp.

    It apparently improves the mpg if anything and makes it more responsive generally.

    Presumably you should really tell your insyrance company, but I can't see how they'd ever find out myself. For all I know, my car could have been remapped before I got it anyway.

    I'm no expert, but I don't think it'd be an extra strain on the engine as you're freeing up extra existing power.
  • anewman
    anewman Posts: 9,200 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    As I understand the re-mapping thing, all it involves is flashing the ECU with new firmware. The ECU controls the regulation of fuel injection and a whole host of other things like ignition timing. The ECU makes the best compromise between performance, fuel economy, and exhaust emissions.

    I could be wrong but AFAIK re-mapping just makes the ECU pump more fuel into the engine giving a bit of a performance boost. Garages may claim you'll get better MPG but I doubt there's any difference. Ready to be proven wrong of course :)

    In the Skoda engines, for earlier cars there was a 136 and 135 engine. Both were identical 1.3l petrol engines, appart from some sort of difference with the valves that meant the 136 had more compression and hence higher BHP. The difference was definitely mechanical, and not computer controlled.

    You could also increase BHP by having a broken exhaust as the lambda sensor would read more oxygen and pump more fuel into the engine to compensate.

    Re-maps are probably more often taken up by boy racers who want the highest BHP number possible.
  • Throbbe
    Throbbe Posts: 469 Forumite
    anewman wrote: »
    I could be wrong but AFAIK re-mapping just makes the ECU pump more fuel into the engine giving a bit of a performance boost. Garages may claim you'll get better MPG but I doubt there's any difference. Ready to be proven wrong of course :)

    Results will be unspectacular on normally aspirated cars anyway. I saw a 20bhp increase from 150 when I had my old car done*, and a slight increase in emissions (still well below the fail rate) which would support the view that they just add more fuel.

    Turbos (including diesels) can show spectacular results as usually boost is increased as well.


    * The people who did the work were actually suprised it was much more than 10-15bhp and suggested it was down to errors in the before/after rolling road readings. How's that for honesty?
  • theboylard
    theboylard Posts: 1,211 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I have a Skoda 1.8 vRS, rated at 180 bhp. For about 2 hrs work and and £460, I can have it remapped and get an extra 40-45 nags! This is because it uses the same engine as the older Audi TT, with the mapping restricting it.

    Not that I'm a boy racer :)
    4kWp, SSE, SolarEdge P300 optimisers & SE3500 Inverter, in occasionally sunny Corby, Northants.
    Now with added Sunsynk 5kw hybrid ecco inverter & 15kWh Fogstar batteries. Oh Octopus Energy too.
  • HannaB
    HannaB Posts: 345 Forumite
    Just like to say thanks for all the replies.

    Not really sure I'll try the mapping. I'm only after a run around to take me to and from work/shops/taxi-ing inlaws to the Garden Centre, with the occasional trip up the M1 to see the family.

    I'm off to my first car auction next week in Blackbushe (with empty pockets so I'm not tempted). Just to see how they tick. I don;t know, I'm new to all this. I just went straight to Renault last time. lol!
    Please continue to hold the line. Your call is very important to us and will be answered by next available robot...
  • tomstickland
    tomstickland Posts: 19,538 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Throbbe wrote: »
    Results will be unspectacular on normally aspirated cars anyway. I saw a 20bhp increase from 150 when I had my old car done*, and a slight increase in emissions (still well below the fail rate) which would support the view that they just add more fuel.

    Turbos (including diesels) can show spectacular results as usually boost is increased as well.


    * The people who did the work were actually suprised it was much more than 10-15bhp and suggested it was down to errors in the before/after rolling road readings. How's that for honesty?
    You are quite correct about turbo gains versus normally aspirated.
    However 150 to 170BHP is not plausible from ECU changes. The only variables they can change are ignition timing and fuel injection pulse length. Even at fuelling for maximum power you will not gain 10% unless the original engine was so far from optimum it was a joke. Then again, most rolling roads have no real absolute calibration and know that owner ego massaging is the most important task.
    Happy chappy
  • HannaB wrote: »
    I'm off to my first car auction next week in Blackbushe (with empty pockets so I'm not tempted). Just to see how they tick. I don;t know, I'm new to all this. I just went straight to Renault last time. lol!

    When you go ask about the buyers premium and any other charges which will be added to the cost of the car at the fall of the hammer.
  • I have just bought a little run about for my daughter. Needed something reliable, low cost to maintain or repair, low insurance costs etc. I talked to a mechanic who does all my own vehicles work and is a one man band and he found it for me, got it MOT'd so it starts with a full year and warranties the state of the car generally for me. It was a FANTASTIC price for what it is and its condition and although she is under 25, we've just sorted her insurance for under HALF of her renewal quote (using Quidco of course:T ). He has now found a replacement for my father's old jalopy which has also now given uop the ghost and I trust him implicitly. He is looking for a replacement for me too. He is based in Northamptonshire so if you'd like details PM me and I'm certain he'll help and you can buy with assurance of what you're getting for your money. Good luck anyway.:j
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.