PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

how does the budegt affect BTL?

1246714

Comments

  • Innys1
    Innys1 Posts: 3,434 Forumite
    Two can play at that game - I was exasperated at your posting. See how easy it is?
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,721 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    Winrick wrote: »
    .

    Under the old/current system this reduced the effective mortgage rate paid by BTL landlords from x% to x(1-marginal tax rate)%. The nex system means it is now x(1-20%tax rate)%. Assuming the landlord had a mortgage rate of 3% before tax and was a 40% tax payer, it was really 1.8% after tax. Now it will be 2.4% instead

    This is what I assumed the budget change meant.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,721 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    Innys1 wrote: »
    There's more bad news - or good, depending on your point of view. The 10% wear and tear allowance is being discontinued:

    http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/mortgages/2015/07/summer-budget-2015-buy-to-let-landlords-hit-by-reduced-tax-breaks?_ga=1.252529481.1504906992.1415399208

    Looks like a fair few BTL landlords are going to have to think twice, especially accidental ones or those who climbed aboard the bandwagon recently.

    It will be based on actual expenses incurred instead, so it will be fairer - even if harder to calculate.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • I understand Tan's confusion, as I've read all this and still don't get it. Surely up until now ALL interest was tax deductible wasn't it? Ignoring all other allowable expenses, say I had £10,000 in rental income and £1000 mortgage interest that would leave £9000 that would be taxed at my tax rate, so 20% or 40% depending what bracket I was in. This is pretty much what the official gov.uk site says: /renting-out-a-property/paying-tax

    So I can see that if I was a high band tax payer, I was technically getting a 40% tax break on the interest. But now George is saying the tax break will be reduced to 20% for everyone, which is what it would have been for low rate tax payers already?

    Presumably it will no longer be an allowable deduction and will have to be worked out some other way?
  • Innys1
    Innys1 Posts: 3,434 Forumite
    silvercar wrote: »
    It will be based on actual expenses incurred instead, so it will be fairer - even if harder to calculate.

    It's not hard to calculate - landlords just need to keep receipts.

    As it happens, at present landlords have the option of the 10% or claiming the receipts. That choice is just being removed.
  • Innys1
    Innys1 Posts: 3,434 Forumite
    loafer999 wrote: »
    I understand Tan's confusion, as I've read all this and still don't get it. Surely up until now ALL interest was tax deductible wasn't it? Ignoring all other allowable expenses, say I had £10,000 in rental income and £1000 mortgage interest that would leave £9000 that would be taxed at my tax rate, so 20% or 40% depending what bracket I was in. This is pretty much what the official gov.uk site says: /renting-out-a-property/paying-tax

    So I can see that if I was a high band tax payer, I was technically getting a 40% tax break on the interest. But now George is saying the tax break will be reduced to 20% for everyone, which is what it would have been for low rate tax payers already?

    Presumably it will no longer be an allowable deduction and will have to be worked out some other way?

    That isn't what Tan was saying. They were saying that BR tax payers were somehow being disadvantaged by the change when, in fact, they were unaffected.

    As it happens, your understanding was the same as mine but that seems to be incorrect. To be honest, I can't be bothered to do the maths any more.
  • marshall666
    marshall666 Posts: 53 Forumite
    edited 8 July 2015 at 5:43PM
    loafer - you've got it correct, apart from the last statement - I think it will be calculated as Martin has demonstrated.

    I was confused by martin's working, but it does clarify how the relief works:

    Currently the tax relief on interest matches the tax rate - so the net result is that there's no tax due on interest.

    The tax relief on interest will now be limited to 20%, so if you were paying 20% tax then relief will still match the tax rate, and the net result is still no tax on the interest.
    If you are paying 40% then you will have to pay 40% less the relief of 20%, with a net result of 20% tax on the interest. if you pay 45% then net result is 25% tax on interest.

    This is much rosier than what I initially thought, which is that everyone will be paying basic rate tax on interest, but higher rate will be limited to paying only 20%!
    Edit:
    I think the article is still wrong. It is saying that on 20,000 rental income with 10,000 being interest, "profit" is 10,000 (20k-interest) and tax relief of 20% is applicable to the profit of 10000:
    As an example, currently a landlord rents out their property for £20,000 a year. For ease of explanation, the only expense they claim is all of their mortgage interest – which costs them £10,000 per year. This would leave them with a ‘profit’ of £10,000 per year, on which they would be able to claim tax relief of £4,000 (assuming they are a higher-rate 40% taxpayer).

    Actually, using the interest to calculate profit is the tax relief. They will have to pay 40% tax on the profit of £10k, i.e. £4k.
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Yes, the example in the story appears to be utter rubbish that has no understanding of the effect of deducting expenses. Some weird idea that it's the after expenses money that it calls "profit" on which the relief is being given when it's the deduction of the expenses that gives it.

    Landlords aren't going to subsidise their tenant housing costs by paying what is in effect the tenant's mortgage interest, so rents will either go up by the increased tax bill or landlords will use companies as a requirement of the market to have competitive rents.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Innys1 wrote: »
    You have nothing to worry about then. It only affects those who pay 40% tax and have BTL income.

    This is the first step of a gradual policy. Given the illiquidity of property. There'll be plenty of notice of changes.
  • Scarlets_mum
    Scarlets_mum Posts: 53 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I am completely confused by this.
    We have a BTL and using the figures already discussed say income £20k and interest of £10k giving a profit of £10k. As a higher rate tax payer we have then paid tax on the £10k ie £4,000. Have we been doing it wrong? Should we have been claiming relief on the interest ie paying tax on £6000 (£10k profit less Tax relief of £4k ie 40% of of interest of £10k) giving a bill of £2400. (6000 x 40%)

    Feeling very confused and sorry if I have repeated other posts but its not clear to me!

    Thanks all
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.