We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Sitting test in own car

124

Comments

  • Car_54
    Car_54 Posts: 9,078 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    prowla wrote: »
    Nope - he asked me to drive past the car park and drop him off on the street in front of the door.

    Many test centres have very limited parking, or none at all, so it's perfectly normal to finish a test by pulling up on a nearby street.
  • And back to that original point - 'I knew I'd passed because he made me drop him off at the test centre'.

    I do hope nobody will now suggest that 'I knew I'd passed coz he made me drop him of at X Street instead of Y'
  • Mobeer
    Mobeer Posts: 1,851 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Academoney Grad Photogenic
    My instructor insisted he drive home after I passed because he was not insured to have a non-learner driver at the wheel.
  • Aye and then along came the Data Protection Act that would also have meant your were being illegal if you'd have driven home.
  • prowla
    prowla Posts: 14,318 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    And back to that original point - 'I knew I'd passed because he made me drop him off at the test centre'.

    I do hope nobody will now suggest that 'I knew I'd passed coz he made me drop him of at X Street instead of Y'
    Crikey, you do like to argue the point in a quasi troll-like manner.

    To clarify that original point, I would suggest that to most people "dropping someone off" means that you stop the car, they get out, and then you drive on; evidently an examiner who did not plan to pass the person could not ask them to drop them off on a public highway, as that would be illegal, and therefore the act of them asking the person to drop them off could only mean that they were going to pass (and therefore would be able to drive off legally on their own).

    So yes, your 'I knew I'd passed coz he made me drop him of at X Street instead of Y' (where Y is an off-road car park) is indeed a completely logical suggestion.
  • robbies_gal
    robbies_gal Posts: 7,895 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    but you have ti drop them somewhere-he cant just sit with u in your car all day because u didnt pass
    What goes around-comes around
  • Nick_C
    Nick_C Posts: 7,675 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Home Insurance Hacker!
    Mobeer wrote: »
    My instructor insisted he drive home after I passed because he was not insured to have a non-learner driver at the wheel.

    How odd. I had a further six hours of tuition with my instructor after I passed.
  • robbies_gal
    robbies_gal Posts: 7,895 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    maybe some dont offer pass plus lessons
    What goes around-comes around
  • prowla wrote: »
    Crikey, you do like to argue the point in a quasi troll-like manner.

    To clarify that original point, I would suggest that to most people "dropping someone off" means that you stop the car, they get out, and then you drive on; evidently an examiner who did not plan to pass the person could not ask them to drop them off on a public highway, as that would be illegal, and therefore the act of them asking the person to drop them off could only mean that they were going to pass (and therefore would be able to drive off legally on their own).

    So yes, your 'I knew I'd passed coz he made me drop him of at X Street instead of Y' (where Y is an off-road car park) is indeed a completely logical suggestion.

    Candidate and supervising driver attend the test centre (whether that's instructor or parent). Candidate and examiner drive round the test route and return to the test centre. Examiner gets out and instructor/patent gets back in.


    If the centre does not have off road parking/sufficient space then the examiner gets the candidate to park on the road and gets out.


    The road chosen to park on is in no way a reflection of whether you are about to be given a pass certificate - it can't because the test is not complete until you've safely & legally parked and also there are questions at the end.


    I'd suggest that in your scenario, the learner would have no accompanying driver to get back in after the test, which would be bizarre but even more bizarre would be that the examiner feeling the need to get the candidate to park elsewhere just because they would be driving away after the test.

    Are you inferring that asking a failed candidate to park on the road whilst the supervising driver returns, is illegal?
  • maybe some dont offer pass plus lessons

    It's an excuse - there's no substance to the insurance thing. Though there is good reason not to let a candidate drive away after the test (see my earlier post).


    Many instructors feel it's just easier to tell the candidate it's an insurance issue than to explain the real reason.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.