We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
What is seller playing at?
Comments
-
DandelionPatrol wrote: »Well, you could just try creating a new ID on the system.
If that works, do please come back and let us know, because it is a new slant on having lots of offers and lots of people offering, if most of them are really the same people making progressively higher offers.
That idea almost appealed to my frenzied mind, until I pictured myself feverishly outbidding my alter egos0 -
Windsorcastle wrote: »That idea almost appealed to my frenzied mind, until I pictured myself feverishly outbidding my alter egos0
-
It's a crazy situation but being in London goes a fair way to explaining a few things. Still, keep us posted. I think by law they need to pass on your higher offers, regardless of their stupid system.
Good luck with this, it sounds like you need it here.Thinking critically since 1996....0 -
DandelionPatrol wrote: »You manage your alter egos on here OK, don't you?
Now there's an idea! I could have hours of fun abusing myself and telling myself how stupid I must be! :rotfl:0 -
somethingcorporate wrote: »It's a crazy situation but being in London goes a fair way to explaining a few things. Still, keep us posted. I think by law they need to pass on your higher offers, regardless of their stupid system.
Good luck with this, it sounds like you need it here.
Thankyou Somethingcorporate. It's just frustrating. And much as I criticise high street agents, I wish I was dealing with one now, as I'm damn sure they'd be biting my hand off for a better offer!0 -
Maybe someone offered them £70k over. Maybe they sold to a relative. Maybe they only accept offers on Thursdays because of bingo and darts.0
-
So the latest is that the vendor has accepted an offer 'in principle' but has gone back to everyone else inviting 'best and final offers' by tomorrow.
I said to the EA that if I was the person whose offer has been accepted I would be very angry, and she agreed! I got the impression that they have had a lot of confused and frustrated bidders ringing them about this one...
So now it's the usual stab in the dark to try and guess what will clinch the deal. However I'm assuming the current accepted bidder won't have been rejected and therefore won't have the opportunity to increase his/her bid so this could get even more bizarre...0 -
Sounds like a very tImid or very inexperienced EA. Who is clearly out of her depth. She really ought to be taking control of the situation.
In cases like this, where a property is attracting multiple offers, the best practice is to go for sealed bids.
All offers to be in writing, with proof of funds, by close of business on a given date. Proof of funds would either be a copy of the AIP, or if a cash purchase, then a simple letter from the purchasers solicitor to say that the purchaser has provided evidence to show that sufficient funds are in place. No need to show bank statements or disclose personal Financial details to either the EA or the Vendor.0 -
Windsorcastle wrote: »So the latest is that the vendor has accepted an offer 'in principle' but has gone back to everyone else inviting 'best and final offers' by tomorrow.
I said to the EA that if I was the person whose offer has been accepted I would be very angry, and she agreed! I got the impression that they have had a lot of confused and frustrated bidders ringing them about this one...
So now it's the usual stab in the dark to try and guess what will clinch the deal. However I'm assuming the current accepted bidder won't have been rejected and therefore won't have the opportunity to increase his/her bid so this could get even more bizarre...
Normally all parties are included in the "best and final" process, including the current high bidder.0 -
Clearly this house is attractive because it has been undervalued. However with this level of interest it is unlikely that it will remain undervalued, so look for something else at the price level you think you will end up having to pay.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards