We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Can I keep the child tax credit?
Shnookina
Posts: 16 Forumite
My son has decided he wants to spend more nights at his dads than at home with me. I still need to pay for things for him and such. I dont think his father is making a claim for the child tax credit so should i keep claiming it? I presume it would stop if he made a claim for it?
0
Comments
-
My son has decided he wants to spend more nights at his dads than at home with me. I still need to pay for things for him and such. I dont think his father is making a claim for the child tax credit so should i keep claiming it? I presume it would stop if he made a claim for it?
How many nights exactly?
IQ0 -
as it stands right now hes staying with me 2 nights a week0
-
as it stands right now hes staying with me 2 nights a week
I would say you probably can't claim because you are no longer 'responsible' for him.
Responsible for tax credits means he is 'normally living' with you. I would say that 2 nights a week is not normally living with you, he is normally living with the other parent.
IQ0 -
My son has decided he wants to spend more nights at his dads than at home with me. I still need to pay for things for him and such. I dont think his father is making a claim for the child tax credit so should i keep claiming it? I presume it would stop if he made a claim for it?
If you can agree amongst yourselves then you can keep the child benefit and child tax credits.:footie:
Regular savers earn 6% interest (HSBC, First Direct, M&S)
Loans cost 2.9% per year (Nationwide) = FREE money.
0 -
If you can agree amongst yourselves then you can keep the child benefit and child tax credits.
That isn't correct.
You can only do that where the child is said to 'normally live' with both parents and they then look at the main responsibility test if the parents can't decide.
The qualifying condition remains that the child has to be normally living with the person claiming - if the child isn't doing that then there is no entitlement regardless of whether the other parent agrees or not.
IQ0 -
It sounds as if the son does live with both parents so it is up to the parents to decide amongst themselves. 2 days is still 2 days what defines living with both parents? Is it only exactly 3.5 days?Icequeen99 wrote: »That isn't correct.
You can only do that where the child is said to 'normally live' with both parents and they then look at the main responsibility test if the parents can't decide.
The qualifying condition remains that the child has to be normally living with the person claiming - if the child isn't doing that then there is no entitlement regardless of whether the other parent agrees or not.
IQ:footie:
Regular savers earn 6% interest (HSBC, First Direct, M&S)
Loans cost 2.9% per year (Nationwide) = FREE money.
0 -
It sounds as if the son does live with both parents so it is up to the parents to decide amongst themselves. 2 days is still 2 days what defines living with both parents? Is it only exactly 3.5 days?
Normally living with is defined by HMRC as its ordinary every day meaning of regularly, usually, typically lives with them which allows for temporary or occasional absences.
I would say in this case, and indeed many I have dealt with, he wouldn't be said to be normally living with the OP.
It's up to the OP to decide really if she thinks he does meet that definition and if so, then she can keep claiming. It would only be an issue if HMRC picked it up on a compliance check.
IQ0 -
-
If the child has all his clothes/possessions etc at his mum's house but spends the nights at his dad's - perhaps because dad is working, then it could be argued that mum still has the main responsibility.
So, you need to ask what is the set up? If dad is working where will the child be during the school holidays? Based at Mum's or Dad's?0 -
pmlindyloo wrote: »If the child has all his clothes/possessions etc at his mum's house but spends the nights at his dad's - perhaps because dad is working, then it could be argued that mum still has the main responsibility.
So, you need to ask what is the set up? If dad is working where will the child be during the school holidays? Based at Mum's or Dad's?
But the main responsibility test probably won't apply. It is only relevant where both parents meet the 'normally living with' test and there are competing claims.
As there is no competing claim, only the normally living with test is relevant and if she meets that then she can claim without having to consider the main responsibility test.
IQ0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards