Uncle Henry's PCN

Redx

its no longer an appeal, that has already been made, this is a rebuttal , where you rebut their points and its at this point that you make your "appeal" better too , based more on legal points, not mitigation , but as a rebuttal

so you now need to draft a bespoke rebuttal, and an earlier reply today pointed you at rebuttals that you can peruse for your own bespoke rebuttal to this particular invoice and ongoing popla appeal

if you think your beefed up appeal isnt being considered, its at this point that you add the points in too as rebuttals against their evidence pack

its like a game of tennis, backwards and forwards, each trying to outdo the other

The_Deep

Have you mentioned v.a.t.? It does no harm to argue that this is not a contractual charge and therefore GPEOL must apply.

Grandad123

Thanks both.


I will now go off and compose a rebuttal.


I had assumed that CPM had seen my appeal and their evidence would be in response to that. Hence I was surprised there was nothing about GPEOL or BB issues and no proof of authority.


It just looked too weak to be true.