We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Why is my bank asking about savings?

Hi

I have just submitted a PPI claim to HSBC.

Yesterday a man from HSBC rang me to ask the same questions that I have answered on the form I sent in and wouldn't tell me why this was necessary.

He then proceeded to ask if I had savings when I took out PPI, if I was paid sick pay or redundancy by my employer at the time.

I asked why this was relevant but he could not tell me. To me, my PPI was either mis sold, or it wasn't. Surely it's the same as if a criminal cons an elderly person out of their pension and the criminal is taken to court. The judge does not decide if the criminal has committed a crime based on the amount of money the elderly person has, it is irrelevant.

Does anyone know if there is a justifiable reason for the banks ringing and asking all the questions I've already answered in a form, and asking questions about any savings, sick pay and redundancy?

Many thanks in advance

Osteobex

Comments

  • It depends on what your reason for claiming the mis-selling was.


    If you had put on the form that you believe it had been mis-sold because you had other means to pay if you did lose your job or on long term sick, then they will want to know what those means were i.e savings, sick pay or if you would have been entitled to redundancy pay.
  • comeandgo
    comeandgo Posts: 5,930 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    One of the reasons I would never need PPI is because my employer pays full sick pay for a year so therefore it should be agreed if I had PPI it was misold as I'd have no use for it. Not all PIP was mis-sold.
  • Angry_Bear
    Angry_Bear Posts: 2,021 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker PPI Party Pooper
    My understanding (and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong), is that these questions are asked to determine whether "you should have PPI" would have been good advice or bad advice based on your circumstances at the time.

    If PPI wasn't a good thing for you (for example, if you had sufficient savings such that you didn't really need insurance), then it shouldn't have been recommended and may well have been mis-sold.
    Do you not know that a man is not dead while his name is still spoken?
    ― Sir Terry Pratchett, 1948-2015
  • Hi Angry Bear, oh I see, I hadn't thought of it like that! many thanks, that helps, I had sick pay and redundancy! fingers crossed:)
  • Hi MoneyMission2015, thanks, thats very helpful!:)
  • Many thanks Comeandgo, that it very helpful :)
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,292 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Does anyone know if there is a justifiable reason for the banks ringing and asking all the questions I've already answered in a form, and asking questions about any savings, sick pay and redundancy?

    If you have mentioned savings in your complaint then they can raise it to clarify. Or if you havent mentioned savings and there are no other failings, then they may be looking at that to see if you have a case there.
    One of the reasons I would never need PPI is because my employer pays full sick pay for a year so therefore it should be agreed if I had PPI it was misold as I'd have no use for it. Not all PIP was mis-sold.

    It can be a good reason on advised cases for loan and credit card PPI. It is not a good reason on MPPI (the FOS has been rejecting 12 months sick pay as a reason on MPPI).
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • magpiecottage
    magpiecottage Posts: 9,241 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    osteobex wrote: »
    I had sick pay
    That may, or may not help you. It depends how much sick pay you would have got. It might have been just Statutory Sick Pay, which is not very much.
    and redundancy
    Nobody is guaranteed redundancy save for a statutory maximum that the employer will pay or, if unable to, the state will. Again, it is not very much. Anything more is at the discretion of the employer and, if they go bust, they will not be able to pay it.

    So again this may not help you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.