Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Housing Shortage Worsening - Another million homes needed in just 10 years....

12346»

Comments

  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    daveyjp wrote: »
    Just seen an architect friend. He doesn't expect housebuilders to suddenly increase output to any more than 2-3 completions a month per site, which it has been for years.

    The market is dominated by a few players, they are making excellent money, profits are good, market is rising.

    Why put more stock onto the market? It needs more capital employed, it needs more labour, it uses land banks which need replacing incurring acquisition and planning costs and it doesn't give developers time to recoup all up front costs from higher prices later in the development phase.

    so basically like many other businesses

    what about the small builders who want to grow : what a fantastic opportunity to make a fortune
  • cells
    cells Posts: 5,246 Forumite
    daveyjp wrote: »
    Just seen an architect friend. He doesn't expect housebuilders to suddenly increase output to any more than 2-3 completions a month per site, which it has been for years.

    The market is dominated by a few players, they are making excellent money, profits are good, market is rising.

    Why put more stock onto the market? It needs more capital employed, it needs more labour, it uses land banks which need replacing incurring acquisition and planning costs and it doesn't give developers time to recoup all up front costs from higher prices later in the development phase.


    but that is clearly silly nonsense because England is not one big uniform market it is 11 regional markets and over 350 distinct council areas.

    If you break it down to councils what you find is that the councils that issue more stamps see higher build rates. Its as simple as that.

    mortgages banks regulations materials design etc are all the same and wages are quite uniform. what explains the different build rates is the stamps given out that is the only varying variable in the councils (also price but that seems to have no link in England suggesting everywhere has a shortage and only the quotas are dictating what gets built not the price)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.