We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Incorrect insurance sold? Can I claim?
hubris
Posts: 98 Forumite
Hi,
I own the freehold for a terraced house which is split into two self contained flats.
I owned the leasehold for the upstairs flat until recently (I've moved home), and the leasehold for downstairs is owned by a housing association.
The housing association had their own 'block' insurance policy which covered all of the properties they own. For this reason I thought (incorrectly in retrospect), that in terms of buildings (i.e. not contents) insurance, all I needed to cover was my upstairs flat. So for several years I was buying buildings insurance for the upstairs flat. I later discovered from another insurer that for buildings insurance to be valid, it has to be for the whole building. In essence the insurance I had been buying for several years was invalid/useless.
I very quickly changed my policy to cover the whole building (and invoiced the housing association as appropriate).
My question is - in selling me buildings insurance for my upstairs flat, did my insurance company mis-sell, as it was essentially a useless purchase? Can/should I make a claim?
Thanks.
I own the freehold for a terraced house which is split into two self contained flats.
I owned the leasehold for the upstairs flat until recently (I've moved home), and the leasehold for downstairs is owned by a housing association.
The housing association had their own 'block' insurance policy which covered all of the properties they own. For this reason I thought (incorrectly in retrospect), that in terms of buildings (i.e. not contents) insurance, all I needed to cover was my upstairs flat. So for several years I was buying buildings insurance for the upstairs flat. I later discovered from another insurer that for buildings insurance to be valid, it has to be for the whole building. In essence the insurance I had been buying for several years was invalid/useless.
I very quickly changed my policy to cover the whole building (and invoiced the housing association as appropriate).
My question is - in selling me buildings insurance for my upstairs flat, did my insurance company mis-sell, as it was essentially a useless purchase? Can/should I make a claim?
Thanks.
Please use OpenDocument (ISO 26300) format (.odt - .ods - .odp - .odg) for attachments
0
Comments
-
Did they sell something (ie someone advise you that what they were selling you was what you needed) to you incorrectly, or did you buy it incorrectly?0
-
Was it the same insurer who told you about insuring the whole building. Policies may differ between insurers.
It sounds like you mis bought rather than they miss sold.0 -
Agree with the previous posts, it's up to you to buy the insurance that you required. Unless there's more to it, I can't see how the insurance company was at fault.The housing association had their own 'block' insurance policy which covered all of the properties they own. For this reason I thought (incorrectly in retrospect), that in terms of buildings (i.e. not contents) insurance, all I needed to cover was my upstairs flat0
-
Yes, it was not a case of me being approached and sold a product that wasn't suitable.
I'm just disappointed that the insurance company didn't pipe up and say "this product you're buying isn't suitable and won't provide what you're looking for".
Thanks for your help anyways.Please use OpenDocument (ISO 26300) format (.odt - .ods - .odp - .odg) for attachments0 -
I'm just disappointed that the insurance company didn't pipe up and say "this product you're buying isn't suitable and won't provide what you're looking for".
How would they know?I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards