We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Private Parking fine, I HAVE A PERMIT!

124

Comments

  • ethanjs93
    ethanjs93 Posts: 17 Forumite
    "The concerns have been passed on to the landlord" Now it's a waiting game I guess.

    Thanks everyone for your help, it's easy to see how companies like this get away with conning people out of their money, hopefully that won't be the case on this occasion.
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 10 June 2015 at 3:58PM
    sounds to me as if the person who sent that email was the office tea-person, I myself am not trained in law but even I can see all the flaws in that email and its clearly been written by somebody who hasnt a clue about the law or what the words they are using legally mean

    which would be fair enough if it was the "man or woman in the street" with no involvement in estate agency business or tenancy contracts that had written it

    but it beggars belief that a tenancy management company or estate agency would have written it !

    I know they are unregulated but even so a smattering of legal knowledge and letter writing skills should be required for a job there (plus a copy of an english dictionary)

    here it is again, with the obvious flaws in red
    response from the letting agent


    "Thanks for your email.
    In relation to issue, I have passed this on to the landlord and will await his reply.
    Please note however,

    that the landlord is in no way in breach of allowing you quiet enjoyment of the property.

    incorrect, the tenancy agreement includes the parking as part of the "property" and allows the tenant quiet enjoyment of the parking facilities, without harassment

    There has been a breach of the parking regulations to the rear car park,

    there are no regulations covering the car park , only made up rules which are not on the tenancy agreement

    and the parking company have gone down all of the correct and lawful channels,

    I very much doubt that UKCPS have done this, they rarely do

    in regards to recovering the parking fine.

    fine ? there is no fine , only a court can fine you and this has not been to court

    I will keep you posted, with regards to the landlords reply"
    I believe that a judge would differ on those issues and I would tell them that they will be called to court to account for that statement and to explain themselves in front of the judge (if this went to court)
  • ethanjs93
    ethanjs93 Posts: 17 Forumite
    Whilst I understand your point of view, the issue is that the valid permit you hold, was not displayed as required. Secondly, there is no requirement for the tenancy agreement to mention anything about the parking control. The terms of the parking are clearly noted in the parking area, and as such, by parking your car in the car park, you are entering into an agreement, as with any other car-park in the country.


    In terms of the cancellation of the ticket, I have had a reply from the landlord, who has asked you to provide evidence that the permit was in the property at the time the ticket was issued. Hopefully, you will have taken a photo of where the permit was etc. If you can provide this, the landlord will speak to the parking company about this. One thing to point out, that the landlord has mentioned, is that should he speak to the parking company, he may not be able to have the entire ticket cancelled, due to the time lapse between the ticket being issued and you lodging an appeal.
  • ethanjs93
    ethanjs93 Posts: 17 Forumite
    The above is the reply from the same person at the letting agency
  • Herzlos
    Herzlos Posts: 16,377 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    ethanjs93 wrote: »
    Whilst I understand your point of view, the issue is that the valid permit you hold, was not displayed as required. Secondly, there is no requirement for the tenancy agreement to mention anything about the parking control. The terms of the parking are clearly noted in the parking area, and as such, by parking your car in the car park, you are entering into an agreement, as with any other car-park in the country.

    But it can't override that agreed by the tenancy agreement.
    One thing to point out, that the landlord has mentioned, is that should he speak to the parking company, he may not be able to have the entire ticket cancelled, due to the time lapse between the ticket being issued and you lodging an appeal.

    As the landlord has hired the parking company, the landlord has the ability to order the parking company to cancel the ticket up until the courtroom door. The PPC operates purely on the landlords behalf, and with the landlord wanting it cancelled, the PPC is powerless.
  • Marktheshark
    Marktheshark Posts: 5,841 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Dear Letting agents, your e-mail appears to be getting intercepted and the village idiot appears to be answering them.
    I do Contracts, all day every day.
  • DandelionPatrol
    DandelionPatrol Posts: 1,313 Forumite
    ethanjs93 wrote: »
    ethanjs93 wrote: »
    Whilst I understand your point of view, the issue is that the valid permit you hold, was not displayed as required. Secondly, there is no requirement for the tenancy agreement to mention anything about the parking control. The terms of the parking are clearly noted in the parking area, and as such, by parking your car in the car park, you are entering into an agreement, as with any other car-park in the country.


    In terms of the cancellation of the ticket, I have had a reply from the landlord, who has asked you to provide evidence that the permit was in the property at the time the ticket was issued. Hopefully, you will have taken a photo of where the permit was etc. If you can provide this, the landlord will speak to the parking company about this. One thing to point out, that the landlord has mentioned, is that should he speak to the parking company, he may not be able to have the entire ticket cancelled, due to the time lapse between the ticket being issued and you lodging an appeal.
    The above is the reply from the same person at the letting agency
    It looks to me as though the Agent is beginning to do some wriggling on behalf of the Landlord.

    If parking is not included in the tenancy, then the issue over the parking permit is not an issue with the legal person of the Landlord as Landlord under the AST, it is with the Landlord as the legal person as proprietor of the parking spaces. Got that? So the rules about penalties for not displaying permits are set outside of the AST. And I think the Agent and the Landlord are trying to wriggle to that position.

    To keep safe, you need to be able to show that the parking is under the AST - ideally that the permit was handed over without separate payment and that the AST contains no terms relating to display of permit.
  • ManxRed
    ManxRed Posts: 3,530 Forumite
    ethanjs93 wrote: »
    Whilst I understand your point of view, the issue is that the valid permit you hold, was not displayed as required.

    Secondly, there is no requirement for the tenancy agreement to mention anything about the parking control.

    1. Under the AST, there is no requirement to display a permit. Not sure why they're struggling with this, it's not complicated.

    2. Yes there is, sadly (for them). The AST takes priority over cheap plastic signs affixed to the car park wall. If you are required to display a permit then it MUST be in the AST.


    As for what the Landlord can and can't do with respect to instructing the Parking Company, he needs to Google 'Law of Agency' and 'Vicarious Liability' and then have another go at answering your concerns.
    Je Suis Cecil.
  • ethanjs93
    ethanjs93 Posts: 17 Forumite
    After a little bit more back and forth with the letting agency, they have been in touch with the landlord who has "requested" that the parking company cancel the ticket.

    Thank you everyone for helping out.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.