We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Annual RPIX linked rent increase calculation errors by letting agent

peajayni
peajayni Posts: 1 Newbie
edited 8 June 2015 at 5:09PM in House buying, renting & selling
Hi,

I just want to check that my understanding is correct. My tenancy agreement states that my rent will increase by "...one and a half times the retail price index (RPIX) published in the month before the increase becomes due."

If this were coming into force in May 2015, my understanding is that the increase would be 1.5*0.9% = 1.35%. However, my letting agents are tying to charge 1.5 * 2.58 = 3.87%. Their value of 2.58 seems to be the raw RPI for April of 258 divided by 100?!

Is my understanding correct in that it should be 1.35%?

Thanks

Comments

  • slopemaster
    slopemaster Posts: 1,581 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Yes, I think you are correct and they are stupid
  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,179 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Yes - you are correct. And if you want to refer them to the relevant Office for National statistics website page, it's here: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/datasets-and-tables/data-selector.html?cdid=CDKQ&dataset=mm23&table-id=2.2
  • jjlandlord
    jjlandlord Posts: 5,099 Forumite
    edited 8 June 2015 at 6:50PM
    They are not stupid, it's the clause that is at fault (If they drafted it then fair enough, they don't understand what they are doing).

    The clause says that the rent will increase by 1.5 time the RPI. From OP, the relevant RPI is 258 so the increase should indeed be 387.
    The real question is thus 387 what? pounds? pence? percent?

    It does not make sense without the unit but their use of the raw RPI is correct according to the clause.

    0.9% is not the RPI, it's the annual rate of change of the RPI.
  • slopemaster
    slopemaster Posts: 1,581 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    jjlandlord wrote: »
    0.9% is not the RPI, it's the annual rate of change of the RPI.

    You are quite correct
  • martinsurrey
    martinsurrey Posts: 3,368 Forumite
    jjlandlord is spot on.

    The clause has no units, but does not mention the rate of change of the RPIX. Just RPIX which was 258.
  • Xbigman
    Xbigman Posts: 3,918 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Surely that is a mistake in the drafting of the agreement otherwise you would have exponentially increasing rents?



    Darren
    Xbigman's guide to a happy life.

    Eat properly
    Sleep properly
    Save some money
  • DandelionPatrol
    DandelionPatrol Posts: 1,313 Forumite
    Xbigman wrote: »
    Surely that is a mistake in the drafting of the agreement otherwise you would have exponentially increasing rents?
    Any RPI linked increment agreement is exponential if the RPI increases at a constant %age each year, even if it is as little as 1%.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.