We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Rbs dispute

My elderly parents have household insurance with rbs. At the end of last year there was a terrible storm and a neighbours wooden shed blew away and landed on top of their roof causing substantial damage. The house was built in the early 70's so the tiles that are on the roof can no longer be sourced therefore it can't be repaired. Someone came to see the damage and advised whole new roof required. To cut long story short rbs say they will only pay half which means my parents forking out 7,500 of their own money (a huge amount to them!) It seems incredibly unfair to me? I live quite a distance away but really feel they shouldn't accept this? They have been arguing with tbs for some time now and I feel they are ready to give in. The roof looks unsightly with wooden planks covering the felt and I think they just want it fixed. Anyone got knowledge on this?

Comments

  • forgotmyname
    forgotmyname Posts: 32,946 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Reclamation yard to source the original tiles?
    Censorship Reigns Supreme in Troll City...

  • InsideInsurance
    InsideInsurance Posts: 22,460 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Standard home insurers exclude "matching set" cover, in fact the inclusion of it in High Net Worth policies is probably one of the biggest selling points on it for me.

    What that means is that they are only liable for the damage that was sustained and not for anything else that is undamaged. In many cases where the set is still in production this isnt an issue because they just buy a new kitchen cupboard door or set of tiles and thats that. The problem arises where either the thing isnt made any more or your not able to buy just 1 earring or such.

    The policybook should set out what happens in these cases but the norm is that they will simply pay the cash value of doing your bit of the job based on last known prices etc and then its up to you to fund the rest of it if you dont want one odd door/ patch of different tiles etc. The FOS have on occasions instructed the insurer to pay up 50% towards replacing the rest despite the matching set clause but I dont know of any cases where they've made them pay for all the undamaged elements to be replaced too

    Have a look at http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/household-insurance-repairs.html and scroll down to the Matching Set section
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.