Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Importing workers

13»

Comments

  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,090 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Is being a teacher or prison officer in the private sector any less stressful than doing the same job in the public sector.

    Tromking said less stressful roles.
    I read that as not necessarily doing the same job (especially if wanting les stress).
    So for example a prison officer could become a security guard at a hotel, business or shop.
    People would do that for less stress and it would be an active decision to take less money in most cases.
  • Tromking
    Tromking Posts: 2,691 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    michaels wrote: »
    Is being a teacher or prison officer in the private sector any less stressful than doing the same job in the public sector. For sure the pay is a lot less in the private sector when you factor in the pensions.....

    My wife is a teacher and it's widely acknowledged that the hit you usually take in lower remuneration in private sector teaching is offset by the better working environment you enjoy in the average private school.
    Private and Public sector prisons are much of a muchness now, as the adoption of the private sector model in public prisons, staffing levels and pay etc. have broadly speaking now made both sphere`s unfit for purpose.
    “Britain- A friend to all, beholden to none”. 🇬🇧
  • Tromking
    Tromking Posts: 2,691 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    lisyloo wrote: »
    Tromking said less stressful roles.
    I read that as not necessarily doing the same job (especially if wanting les stress).
    So for example a prison officer could become a security guard at a hotel, business or shop.
    People would do that for less stress and it would be an active decision to take less money in most cases.

    Exactly, thankyou.
    For example, why deal with damaged young men at HMP Feltham when a less stressful/dangerous role on security at Heathrow Airport is there to be had.
    “Britain- A friend to all, beholden to none”. 🇬🇧
  • princeofpounds
    princeofpounds Posts: 10,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I wonder how much this problem has exacerbated since paramedics can only now be recruited from those who've done a Paramedic course at university or those who are recruited via the Student Paramedic route whose numbers are, I believe, minimal?
    This was a topic I was going to mention too, but I didn't know the specifics for paramedics.


    Certainly in (British) medicine there is a large tendency towards centrally planned quotas of training and a 'guild' system of self-regulation. It is also a big problem for labour market flexibility.


    To a certain extent this is necessary to protect standards, but often it just amounts to protectionism.


    For instance, in the case of doctors there are vast queues of people who want to get into medical school. They may not all be AAAA people (although many of those get turned down anyway as we know), but the truth is that even an AAAB student is probably going to be a perfectly good GP.


    It would cost some money to train a few more, but that sum would pale against the savings by having more competition for jobs and lower wage rates.


    I bet you that if you went to all those decent candidates turned down by medical schools and offered them a place for 10% less wages in future, most would take you up on that.
  • kabayiri
    kabayiri Posts: 22,740 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    It is pretty obvious that people make cost of living calculations before taking on new work roles.

    The underlying problem is clearly the expense of London living, of which accommodation must surely dominate.

    So why do we not explore heavily discounting travel into the capital? Make it attractive for key workers to live outside London.

    Just building more property in London encourages more property speculation does it not?
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,090 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It's not just the cost of travel that's undesirable, it's the overcrowding, time and unreliability.
    Your discount suggestion only fixes the cost issue but makes the overcrowding worse.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    kabayiri wrote: »
    It is pretty obvious that people make cost of living calculations before taking on new work roles.

    The underlying problem is clearly the expense of London living, of which accommodation must surely dominate.

    So why do we not explore heavily discounting travel into the capital? Make it attractive for key workers to live outside London.

    Just building more property in London encourages more property speculation does it not?

    So people, with modest incomes in Hull, should subsidise somewhat richer people commuting into London?

    Why ever does increased supply encourage speculation?

    A surplus of apples encourages all the wide boys to buy apples?

    Good for global warming however.
  • Tromking
    Tromking Posts: 2,691 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Interesting to see the issue of a new generational gap in the civil service being mentioned in this report. A third of civil servants are now aged 50-59!

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33010439
    “Britain- A friend to all, beholden to none”. 🇬🇧
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Tromking wrote: »
    Interesting to see the issue of a new generational gap in the civil service being mentioned in this report. A third of civil servants are now aged 50-59!

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33010439



    seems the Civil Service should have sacked even more people and make up the shortfall by recruitment to balance the age distribution.
  • Tromking
    Tromking Posts: 2,691 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    seems the Civil Service should have sacked even more people and make up the shortfall by recruitment to balance the age distribution.

    An idea currently being trialled in the Prison Service with risible results so far. It seems the private sector style pay and pension ages is ending the idea of time served public sector workers willing to devote the majority of their working lives to a career in public service.
    A great way to save money of course, but at what other cost.
    “Britain- A friend to all, beholden to none”. 🇬🇧
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.