📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Marriage Allowance

1122123125127128193

Comments

  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,541 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    Does anyone know what happens if someone earns just under the HRT threshold but has interest within the PSA which pushes them over? Eg earnings £46,200, interest £300. Total £46,500, but no higher rate tax paid. Can they receive a MA transfer?
  • Consumerist
    Consumerist Posts: 6,311 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    zagfles wrote: »
    Does anyone know what happens if someone earns just under the HRT threshold but has interest within the PSA which pushes them over? Eg earnings £46,200, interest £300. Total £46,500, but no higher rate tax paid. Can they receive a MA transfer?
    Since your total taxable income is greater than the threshold, I would would say you wouldn't be eligible for the MA transfer.
    >:)Warning: In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
  • vacheron
    vacheron Posts: 2,215 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 12 June 2018 at 1:23PM
    zagfles wrote: »
    Does anyone know what happens if someone earns just under the HRT threshold but has interest within the PSA which pushes them over? Eg earnings £46,200, interest £300. Total £46,500, but no higher rate tax paid. Can they receive a MA transfer?

    You wouldn't be eligible. I fell foul of that due to the poor way the qualifying criteria was defined by HMRC when the scheme was first introduced.

    They removed my allowance and made me repay £212 for being £18 over the threshold despite me not being required to pay a single penny of higher rate tax in that year. :mad:
    • The rich buy assets.
    • The poor only have expenses.
    • The middle class buy liabilities they think are assets.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,541 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    vacheron wrote: »
    You wouldn't be eligible. I fell foul of that due to the poor way the qualifying criteria was defined by HMRC when the scheme was first introduced.

    They removed my allowance and made me repay £212 for being £18 over the threshold despite me not being required to pay a single penny of higher rate tax in that year. :mad:
    Thanks, not surprised but it does seem to contradict the legislation where the relevant bit says:
    the individual is not, for the tax year, liable to tax at a rate other than the basic rate, the dividend ordinary rate or the starting rate for savings
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/26/section/11/enacted
  • vacheron
    vacheron Posts: 2,215 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 12 June 2018 at 1:58PM
    zagfles wrote: »
    Thanks, not surprised but it does seem to contradict the legislation where the relevant bit says:
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/26/section/11/enacted

    Yes, when I asked them what was going on when I first encountered the problem I was told for this they use "adjusted net income" which includes savings income but then does not allow the PSA to be deducted.

    ... when I then looked at their own page (the one I linked above) it then said you COULD deduct the PSA.

    When I called back and queried them on this, the page suddenly changed the very next day" (no updated "last edited" date shown on the page, no page revision history update or anything, just a stealthy edit deleting the ability to deduct the interest PSA!)

    This is the kind of sneakiness and non- transparency under which HMRC act (and which seems to have been noticed by quite a few others on the later pages of this thread)!
    • The rich buy assets.
    • The poor only have expenses.
    • The middle class buy liabilities they think are assets.
  • Consumerist
    Consumerist Posts: 6,311 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Might it be worth considering increasing your pension contributions to bring down your "adjusted" income ?
    >:)Warning: In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
  • polymaff
    polymaff Posts: 3,954 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    zagfles wrote: »
    Thanks, not surprised but it does seem to contradict the legislation where the relevant bit says:

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/26/section/11/enacted

    Well, it is quite likely that it will if you use the "enacted" version of the legislation as your reference.

    Always refer to the "Latest available" - and then the "view outstanding changes", too, if you want to be comparing like with like.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,541 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    polymaff wrote: »
    Well, it is quite likely that it will if you use the "enacted" version of the legislation as your reference.

    Always refer to the "Latest available" - and then the "view outstanding changes", too, if you want to be comparing like with like.
    I can't see any changes relevant to this issue.
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,541 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    vacheron wrote: »
    Yes, when I asked them what was going on when I first encountered the problem I was told for this they use "adjusted net income" which includes savings income but then does not allow the PSA to be deducted.

    ... when I then looked at their own page (the one I linked above) it then said you COULD deduct the PSA.

    When I called back and queried them on this, the page suddenly changed the very next day" (no updated "last edited" date shown on the page, no page revision history update or anything, just a stealthy edit deleting the ability to deduct the interest PSA!)

    This is the kind of sneakiness and non- transparency under which HMRC act (and which seems to have been noticed by quite a few others on the later pages of this thread)!
    Interesting, the legislation says nothing about "adjusted net income".
  • JimmyTheWig
    JimmyTheWig Posts: 12,199 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    If the lower earner is a tax-payer but pays more into their pension than they pay tax on, what happens?

    E.g. They earn £13k, self employed. They pay £5k (gross) into private pension.
    They are not a tax payer in the sense that they get more tax credited to their pension than they actually pay.
    But they are a tax payer in the sense that they pay tax.
    My gut feeling is that they should be able to benefit from this scheme (pension contributions help the higher paid spouse to qualify), but I don't think they will - if their tax free allowance is reduced then the amount of tax they actually pay will increase.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.