We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Mortgage overpayment vs investing

124»

Comments

  • Thanks for the clarification Steelbru.
    That seems to make sense to me beefturnmail in that you're then comparing how much you think both will 'beat' inflation by.

    I'm currently considering using a couple of trackers (one UK and one global) and buying shares separately in companies with good long term records of paying good dividends. I think I would rather be choosing the comapnies myself than investing in a dividend tracker.

    Does that seem like a reasonable strategy for someone just starting out? I'm a bit wary of doubling up my portfolio as the index funds will likely be invested in the companies I choose.

    Thanks,
    Chris.
  • Eco_Miser
    Eco_Miser Posts: 4,902 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I think inflation is irrelevant as it affects debt and savings in the same way.
    This is true insofar as it reduces the value of both savings and debt.

    However reduced value of debt is a good thing, while reduced value of savings is a bad thing.
    Eco Miser
    Saving money for well over half a century
  • Thanks Eddie.
    Having researched things a bit more I think I'm going to get a S&S ISA through iWeb and invest into the Vanguard Life Strategy 100.
    I'll also be getting a SIPP most likely through Best Invest investing in the same fund.
    Just need to work out how much to contribute to each now.

    Thanks,
    Chris.
  • badger09
    badger09 Posts: 11,643 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Thanks Eddie.
    Having researched things a bit more I think I'm going to get a S&S ISA through iWeb and invest into the Vanguard Life Strategy 100.
    I'll also be getting a SIPP most likely through Best Invest investing in the same fund.
    Just need to work out how much to contribute to each now.

    Thanks,
    Chris.

    I don't think you've said how much you are planning to invest in your S&S ISA, or whether it will be lump sum or monthly drip feed. Apologies if I've missed it :o

    If you're investing small amounts on a monthly basis, IWEB may not be your best choice as the charge is £5 per deal.

    I'm invested in the VLS 100% with IWEB, but it suits me as I tend to invest in larger chunks (£2500 - £3500)

    I'm sure you will have seen this, but in case you haven't

    http://monevator.com/compare-uk-cheapest-online-brokers/

    Good luck :)
  • Ah, thanks badger09, I think I got a bit confused here as I am planning to monthly drip feed :-).

    I had been using the link you posted and it looked like Charles Stanley Direct would be best but then I used this link and iWeb seemed to come out on top:
    http://www.comparefundplatforms.com/

    Perhaps I entered the wrong info though- 1 fund, initial sum 500, monthly sum 400, number of trades 12.

    Thanks,
    Chris.
  • zolablue25
    zolablue25 Posts: 1,652 Forumite
    redpete wrote: »
    I think it comes down to timescales and a bit of psychology. If I had a 25 yr interest-only mortgage I would be reasonably confident that investments would grow sufficiently to survive the odd market crash and provide enough to pay it off.
    Wasn't this the theory behind endowment mortgages? That didn't seem to do so well.

    In answer to OP I think it matters what your tolerance to risk is. I took the "pay off your mortgage route" but I can see the benefit of the investment route although it is riskier. Given that rates are at historical lows it is difficult to see how much of a millstone your mortgage could be if rates even reverted to the long term norm let alone should we go back to the nineties when 15% was not unheard of.
  • atush
    atush Posts: 18,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Probably because those endowments were with profits, which hit a bad patch with guarantees meaning that they were hit with tighter regulation on what they could hold and reduced equity exposure?

    they also had high commissions paid
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.