We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Letter before action- iv had a reply!

2

Comments

  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    What constitutes legally correct and the real world are not the same.
    Legally there is a case for compensation and there is also a possibility, a very strong one they come out fighting with a huge list of damages to the property .

    Good for them. Are these proveable? A LL who doesnt protect a deposit isnt the most reliable for 'their word'.
  • saverbuyer
    saverbuyer Posts: 2,556 Forumite
    What constitutes legally correct and the real world are not the same.
    Legally there is a case for compensation and there is also a possibility, a very strong one they come out fighting with a huge list of damages to the property .



    The list can be as huge as they want.


    Proving said damage is another story.


    What are the odds a landlord who failed to understand deposit protection had an independent check in/out inventory.
  • LolStevo
    LolStevo Posts: 548 Forumite
    saverbuyer wrote: »
    The list can be as huge as they want.


    Proving said damage is another story.


    What are the odds a landlord who failed to understand deposit protection had an independent check in/out inventory.

    Correct! no inventory was done, i got plenty of pictures showing i had tried to repaint the damp walls however the paint wouldnt stay on!

    The letter was from shelter basically said 'if i do not receive the deposit plus an agreed amount being the penalty for failing to comply with the law within 14 days i will go to court'.
  • Stevie_Palimo
    Stevie_Palimo Posts: 3,306 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I would imagine that any landlord who failed to protect the deposit and has offered it back in full after a threat of legal action would then be more than likely to counter claim in a court action should you take this option after having the deposit paid back, Put it this way she was slippery enough not to protect it and then hope you would roll over and allow her to keep it so what is to say she has a false list of missing stuff that is a lot more than your claim.


    If it were me and I had been offered and got my money back I would move on and save time, stress and expenditure chasing what may amount to nothing extra bar a bill if it goes against you.
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    I would imagine that any landlord who failed to protect the deposit and has offered it back in full after a threat of legal action would then be more than likely to counter claim in a court action should you take this option after having the deposit paid back, Put it this way she was slippery enough not to protect it and then hope you would roll over and allow her to keep it so what is to say she has a false list of missing stuff that is a lot more than your claim.


    If it were me and I had been offered and got my money back I would move on and save time, stress and expenditure chasing what may amount to nothing extra bar a bill if it goes against you.

    Good for you.

    So the LL breaks the law, risks the tenants money, but because shes returned it after a load of stres it's ok?

    For me, screw that and screw the LL. Court, straight away.

    The LL can have a list as long as they want, it's proveable damages. Which will be quite difficult.
  • LolStevo
    LolStevo Posts: 548 Forumite
    Is there anything that could make me lose out if i take her to court?
  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    LolStevo wrote: »
    Is there anything that could make me lose out if i take her to court?

    As long as you are certain (which i suspect you are) that the deposit was not protected, the penalty is a Minimum of 1x and maximum of 3x the value of the deposit.

    I cant comment on any counterclaim as i dont know enough about your individual circumstances. However it sounds like a safe bet.
  • LolStevo
    LolStevo Posts: 548 Forumite
    Guest101 wrote: »
    As long as you are certain (which i suspect you are) that the deposit was not protected, the penalty is a Minimum of 1x and maximum of 3x the value of the deposit.

    I cant comment on any counterclaim as i dont know enough about your individual circumstances. However it sounds like a safe bet.

    Thanks,

    i have checked with 3 schemes a few times and nothing and the landlord didnt know who it was with!

    The counterclaim is what worries me as they have been so horrible for the past 2 years!
  • benjus
    benjus Posts: 5,433 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    LolStevo wrote: »
    The counterclaim is what worries me as they have been so horrible for the past 2 years!

    What grounds do you think they might have to counterclaim? What evidence would they have to back these grounds up?

    I believe that most judges are far from stupid and can tell when someone is inventing baseless claims as revenge for the other party claiming their lawful rights.

    However, if you believe that the LL might have a valid and provable claim against you, you might want to reconsider.
    Let's settle this like gentlemen: armed with heavy sticks
    On a rotating plate, with spikes like Flash Gordon
    And you're Peter Duncan; I gave you fair warning
  • jjlandlord
    jjlandlord Posts: 5,099 Forumite
    LolStevo wrote: »
    My letter states i can claim a penalty of up to 3 times from her however shes not acknowledging that, just wanting to pay the deposit back.

    Obviously...

    Get your deposit and move on.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.