We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Am I allowed to invest? (UK)

2»

Comments

  • billywilly
    billywilly Posts: 468 Forumite
    Murphybear wrote: »
    Because, right or wrong, benefits are often awarded on "entitlement" rather than "need"

    If it ever was the case that benefits were awarded on a needs basis, half the claims that are currently being paid out would be shut down!

    DLA/PIP/Attendance Allowance/Carers Allowance/Contribution Based JSA & ESA and Industrial Injuries Benefit to name but a few - you can be a millionaire and still be awarded them - many people that claim them don't have a need to do so.
  • cbrown372
    cbrown372 Posts: 1,513 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    billywilly wrote: »
    If it ever was the case that benefits were awarded on a needs basis, half the claims that are currently being paid out would be shut down!

    DLA/PIP/Attendance Allowance/Carers Allowance/Contribution Based JSA & ESA and Industrial Injuries Benefit to name but a few - you can be a millionaire and still be awarded them - many people that claim them don't have a need to do so.

    Like yourself Andy :beer:
    Its not that we have more patience as we grow older, its just that we're too tired to care about all the pointless drama ;)
  • Bozzi
    Bozzi Posts: 17 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    How will we have someone for fraud for having stocks and shares?

    As long as they are declared what would be the problem?

    But do I need to declare them if it's under £6k? Or only when its over £6k?
  • rogerblack
    rogerblack Posts: 9,446 Forumite
    Bozzi wrote: »
    But do I need to declare them if it's under £6k? Or only when its over £6k?

    Your obligation is to tell them if your capital exceeds 6K.
    This is your total capital available in all bank accounts and savings, and other things.
    It does not include income paid for that benefit period, but once that period is over, that money is counted.

    In practice, notifying them once you hit around 5.5K is probably wise, to avoid the possibility of future investigations.
  • billywilly
    billywilly Posts: 468 Forumite
    cbrown372 wrote: »
    Like yourself Andy :beer:

    Could I ask you a simple question? Can you point me and everybody else on this site to the last post you made that answered a question?
    I just don't see your point of being on here when you clearly are unable to contribute to answering problems posed by others.
    Complete waster in my opinion.
  • cbrown372
    cbrown372 Posts: 1,513 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    billywilly wrote: »
    Could I ask you a simple question? Can you point me and everybody else on this site to the last post you made that answered a question?
    I just don't see your point of being on here when you clearly are unable to contribute to answering problems posed by others.
    Complete waster in my opinion.

    Jolly good :beer:
    Its not that we have more patience as we grow older, its just that we're too tired to care about all the pointless drama ;)
  • billywilly
    billywilly Posts: 468 Forumite
    cbrown372 wrote: »
    Jolly good :beer:

    There you go then, you don't and can't. Now we all know that you are the troll who chases people over the many boards on here accusing them of being this Andy as well as posting nonsensical one line comments unrelated to the question under review.Hopefully we can all now have a little bit of peace without your inane comments spoiling the threads.
  • konark
    konark Posts: 1,260 Forumite
    I had a £1 bond with nationwide building society and that prevented me from claiming income related ESA.

    Is that what they told you?
  • Mersey_2
    Mersey_2 Posts: 1,679 Forumite
    abrockall wrote: »
    I had a £1 bond with nationwide building society and that prevented me from claiming income related ESA.
    So for god sake don't do stocks and shares. It might not affect ESA but housing benefit will have you for fraud!

    If you can afford to invest why you claiming benefits?



    Why do you think that was the case?


    As others have said £6,000 in assets - including shares - is allowed for income-based benefits. Do you mean you failed to declare £1?!


    It's only potentially fraud if you failed to declare shares.
    Please be polite to OPs and remember this is a site for Claimants and Appellants to seek redress against their bank, ex-boss or retailer. If they wanted morality or the view of the IoD or Bank they'd ask them.
  • Bozzi
    Bozzi Posts: 17 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Cheers for the reply guys, helped much. Decided i'm only going to save a small about as an emergency fund, instead of pouring it into shares, sounds much more sense to me until I'm able to go back to work.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.