We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Barclaycard PPI
riggerz18
Posts: 8 Forumite
Just to let anybody know.....Do not give in if the Financial Ombudsman decision goes against you.
Mine has been going on for a good couple of years now.
I put in a PPI claim against Barclaycard, which the FO declined. I sent them a letter telling them a few home truths (not nasty but just stating a few facts) and low and behold I now have a cheque on it's way for £5000.
Maybe not what I was expecting but considering I wasn't getting a penny!! :beer:
Mine has been going on for a good couple of years now.
I put in a PPI claim against Barclaycard, which the FO declined. I sent them a letter telling them a few home truths (not nasty but just stating a few facts) and low and behold I now have a cheque on it's way for £5000.
Maybe not what I was expecting but considering I wasn't getting a penny!! :beer:
0
Comments
-
Just to let anybody know.....Do not give in if the Financial Ombudsman decision goes against you.
Mine has been going on for a good couple of years now.
I put in a PPI claim against Barclaycard, which the FO declined. I sent them a letter telling them a few home truths (not nasty but just stating a few facts) and low and behold I now have a cheque on it's way for £5000.
Maybe not what I was expecting but considering I wasn't getting a penny!! :beer:
Any rejection from the FOS (adjudicator) can be appealed to the Ombudsman - it will tell you this in a rejection letter.
Around 11% of decisions do get overturned (this, I believe, includes banks appealing as well - it works both ways)Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards