CEL/DEAL Forced To Cough Up Another £160

trisontana

As this PPP thread shows, somebody called CEL's bluff and took them to court to claim costs for a struck-out case that CEL had bought against them.:-
http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=93438&view=findpost&p=1078902

As you can see the OP, was on the ball and asked CEL's legal rep some awkward questions. Such as why Mr Shwartz failed to spot the misspelling of his name in those dozens of document he is supposed to have signed.

Note also the many dirty tricks that CEL employed, such as emailing at the very last minute and the non-existant voice-mails and letters.

bod1467

waamo

They will also have to cough up other fees. They employed a para legal. That will cost too.

trisontana

It gets even better. Take a look at posts #45 & 46 on this CAG thread.:-

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?446296-Claim-form-From-Civil-Enforcement&p=4741354&viewfull=1#post4741354

#46 shows a letter on CO-OP headed notepaper saying that CEL had authority to issue parking tickets and signed by a solicitor implying that the solicitor was writing on behalf of the CO-OP.

#45 says this:-
I have just had an interesting conversation with the Co - Op regarding this letter. Have to say they were very helpful. They confirmed the letter was not from them and not signed by their solicitor.

waamo

I wonder if they will get the choice of a Scottish prison or an English one if they carry on like this?

bazster

Not a member of CAG so can't read the letter, but if it's the Chris Jones letter the CAG poster has got the wrong end of the stick, Co-op is very much responsible for that letter.

esmerobbo

trisontana wrote: »

It gets even better. Take a look at posts #45 & 46 on this CAG thread.:-

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?446296-Claim-form-From-Civil-Enforcement&p=4741354&viewfull=1#post4741354

#46 shows a letter on CO-OP headed notepaper saying that CEL had authority to issue parking tickets and signed by a solicitor implying that the solicitor was writing on behalf of the CO-OP.

#45 says this:-
I have just had an interesting conversation with the Co - Op regarding this letter. Have to say they were very helpful. They confirmed the letter was not from them and not signed by their solicitor.

Strange?

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/have-to-co-op-cut-deal-with-civil.html

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/co-op-confirm-they-have-not-cut-deal.html

enfield_freddy

yes I believe they HAVE cut a deal with deal , I have penned a email

Thank you for your mail.

I have forwarded your query to the Bristol County Court as the above cases are held with that Court.

Regards

P Quinn
County Court Money Claims Centre (CCMCC)
Address: County Court Money Claims Centre,
PO Box 527,
Salford,
M5 0BY
DX: 702634
Salford 5
HMCTS Contact Centre: 0300 123 1372
Fax: 0161 743 4023
Website: www.justice.gov.uk
Enquiries: [EMAIL="ccmcccustomerenquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk"]ccmcccustomerenquiries@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk[/EMAIL]
E-filing: [EMAIL="ccmcce-filing@hmcts.gsi.gov."]ccmcce-filing@hmcts.gsi.gov.[/EMAIL]




and then


to the Bristol court


please could you tell me if the following 2 cases are active, A93YM708 and A79YP365 if so , what is the status and dates that they are supposed to be in court.


the cases are 2 that involve staff from the COOP v CEL/DEAl and were "stayed" back in February , awaiting a COA case that was resolved on 6th may.




thank you for your help , if you cannot assist me , please could you forward my request to someone who can , or send me an email contact of the correct department to assist




however no reply as of yet

stator

enfield_freddy wrote: »

yes I believe they HAVE cut a deal with deal , I have penned a email

PP posted an update saying that no deal was struck and the co-op employee cases are still ongoing.

I would suggest that co-op only provided the letter because their contract required them to. I haven't seen the contract but it would be common practice.

enfield_freddy

I do not believe the letter he sent , until we (I) receive word that those cases are active


I do not believe a word the 2 faced coop say!




I would suggest that co-op only provided the letter because their contract required them to. I haven't seen the contract but it would be common practice.




contract or ex contract , and with whom?


creative car park management 04304436

CREATIVE CAR PARK LTD 05571660

creative car parking LTD ?

CIVIL ENFORCEMENT LTD 05645677

ManxRed

The letter only states that CEL were authorised to issue tickets. And that's it.

That's probably true as well.

It doesn't say anything about their ability to issue court claims against ticket recipients, or anything about the Co-Op having visibility of, or agreeing to, an assignment of 86.5% of the debt to a company called DEAL.