We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Should we get a Mortgage or start investing?

124»

Comments

  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 28,124 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 14 May 2015 at 7:40PM
    Mrs_Z wrote: »
    Personally I would always go for the mortgage before investing. My thinking here is even if the value drops but you can meet your mortgage payments you got a roof over your head whereas with shares, if the price drops, all you have to show for your investment is a worthless piece of paper.
    Well if the OP took their deposit and invested it into an index tracker, then it is certainly true that over the short term they might experience some period of time during which they were seeing a substantial paper loss, perhaps as much as 80% if they chose unwisely and/or were not sufficiently diversified. Losing their job and having no money to fall back on for rent/living costs would be a disaster in this situation.

    Conversely, if they took out a 90% LTV mortgage, they might experience some time where their property value decreased by 10% over the short term wiping out almost all of their stake in the property. Losing their job and having no money to fall back on to meet mortgage payments/living costs in this situation would be every bit as much a disaster.

    So I think the same risk management strategies apply to both scenarios. With suitable precautions having been taken, the temporary paper loss could be ridden out with much the same consequences as prices recovered.

    In terms of trying to generalise the virtues of buying vs. renting, it's almost impossible to do because they depend on so many factors, the most important of which, perhaps, is the individual's need to remain in the area vs their need for flexibility to relocate to find work (and consequently job security is another factor). House prices and house price inflation are wildly different in different parts of the country. So you have some areas where housing is astronomically priced and rising strongly and other areas where housing is cheap and prices stagnant or slowly declining. You have areas where rents are expensive and competition strong and others where prices have been driven down and stable tenants are highly prized. It is also necessary to factor in costs associated with ownership that do not apply when renting (and these can vary greatly from one property to the next). So I think it is a highly individual decision, which is unfortunate because it seems few people are willing to see renting as an acceptable option, regardless of their circumstances.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.