3 One Plan Alternative from CPW

[Deleted User]

http://www.hotukdeals.com/deals/2000-mins-5000-texts-unlimited-4g-data-with-free-roaming-22-countries-1-month-rolling-2205413#post25097771


Basically the One plan without tethering £20 rolling contract.

Kernel_Sanders

In the HUKD link someone's quoted 'Unlimited 4G Data (Does not allow Tethering thanks psycost)'. Does that mean when it switches to 3G (which for most of the population is most of the time ) it's not unlimited?

20aday

I would imagine it's (FUP) Unlimited Data on 4/3G.

Ypaymore

See https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5239571

and: http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/phones/2015/05/carphone-warehouse-launches-mobile-network-but-is-id-any-good?_ga=1.162158204.1999621713.1430361298

[Deleted User]

Ypaymore wrote: »

See https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5239571

and: http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/phones/2015/05/carphone-warehouse-launches-mobile-network-but-is-id-any-good?_ga=1.162158204.1999621713.1430361298

I know it would have been nice to be acknowledged is it because I got it from HUKD?

Pluto88888

They are kicking me off my one plan plan told me to move to this stupid plan £17 200 minutes 12month contract. (!!!!!! is this crap)

I told them £15 payandgo 300 minutes no contract has better value.
(They kept on saying 0800 are free on their new contract plans all 0800 numbers are free from 1st July.)

Guessing three losing touch with the market in the last few months with bt mobile and Id mobile both just launched.

Kernel_Sanders

treboeth wrote: »

I know it would have been nice to be acknowledged is it because I got it from HUKD?

You're annoyed because nobody's thanked your OP?

[Deleted User]

Kernel_Sanders wrote: »

You're annoyed because nobody's thanked your OP?

Mse choose to run an article about the item I posted without acknowledging the source.

Thanks to me are irrelevant the link I gave shows where the thanks should go.

Kernel_Sanders

treboeth wrote: »

Mse choose to run an article about the item I posted without acknowledging the source.

Thanks to me are irrelevant the link I gave shows where the thanks should go.

OK but how do you know HUKD wasn't their source too, or that they hadn't a different one ?

[Deleted User]

Why are you determined to argue over this?

Silk

treboeth wrote: »

Mse choose to run an article about the item I posted without acknowledging the source.

Thanks to me are irrelevant the link I gave shows where the thanks should go.

Why on earth you think the thanks should go to yourself or HUKD I've no idea ???
It's been all over the place for a while such as
22nd April http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3050892/Carphone-Warehouse-launches-mobile-network-iD-boasts-free-roaming-return-12-month-contracts.html

23rd April http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/technology/carphone-warehouse-announces-id---5570687


The list goes on