We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Priase -Consumer Rights bills, end to all online scams
hpuse
Posts: 1,163 Forumite
Expected : October - 2015
Key summary
Key summary
- Right to get what you pay for
- Right that goods and digital content are fit for purpose and services are provided with reasonable care and skill
- Right to have faults in what you buy put right free of charge, or to be provided with a refund or replacement
0
Comments
-
Any hope of people taking responsibility for what they sign up to?0
-
-
How will this make any difference? A copycat site are providing a service that you pay for. The fact you can do it for free if you use the correct site wont protect you.
I think your reading too much into this.
No mention of not sending some complete stranger lots of money when you have no idea if they are legit or not.Censorship Reigns Supreme in Troll City...0 -
What would be of the very greatest use would a some legislation that makes sellers of good and services responsible for stating very clearly and prominently any terms or conditions that may be detrimental to the customer, particularly if these may be unexpected.
An end to people being able to advertise some good or service with an apparently very attractive offer in massive type, with detrimental qualifiers or exclusions buried away in very small print often behind links would be most welcome.
Some of the banks are very good at this, now. When they send a multi-page set of terms and conditions they precede it with an 'executive summary' of anything that is likely to affect the customer in the everyday use of their services.There are two types of people in the world: Those that can extrapolate information.0 -
Agree completely. It may have been the Financial Services Act (?) that forced banks into doing this ... this same requirement should also be mandated in the new CRB.0
-
CRBill will change the way the traders write T&Cs.
For e.g. in my opinion goverment online copycats (if at all they exist post Oct-2015) wont be able to apply DSR exemption on 'services' started from a digital asset that was submitted online.0 -
They can't apply a DSR exemption even now.
0 -
Brilliant Hpuseless. I cannot wait until this campaign bring rejoicing in the streets as you remove the service providers from the Internet, single handedly,
Unfortunately, I feel that the humanoid specimen, who has long arms and short pockets shall remain indifferent to this.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards