We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
House Prices: New Record High - Nationwide +1% MoM +5.3%YoY
Comments
-
ruggedtoast wrote: »Good grief there's another one.
Another what?0 -
floridaman wrote: »Rising house prices are a sign of a healthy economy.
QE pumped unbelievable amounts of £s into the British economy over the years since the financial crisis. Wages did not rise. Price rises have stopped. The economy did not grow. So where did that flood of QE cash go? To the risk averse banks who in turn have lent/are lending in the one and only direction they see as safe - to people who've already got good equity or to 100% gold star borrowers who even then might be underpinned by a help to buy guarantee. The money's being mainly lent for residential property.
Now, why I wonder why are house prices continuing to rise for longer and faster that the laws of physics ought to allow?
Healthy economy?0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »I'll be selling houses but keeping a house.
No need for tents...
''Selling houses'' eh? That's an interesting concept, I take it you haven't noticed how completely paralyzed the non London property market is at the moment due to greedy, deluded vendors.... let's hope you don't fit that description.;)0 -
I thought high house prices made people richer and spend more money?0
-
Doncha just hate it when you can't tell if someone's being ironic?0
-
floridaman wrote: »I thought high house prices made people richer and spend more money?
No just more in debt. Lower house prices would give buyers and renters more spare cash to spend in the economy.:exclamatiScams - Shared Equity, Shared Ownership, Newbuy, Firstbuy and Help to Buy.
Save our Savers
0 -
No just more in debt. Lower house prices would give buyers and renters more spare cash to spend in the economy.
House building ramping up would be a massive boost to GDP to Jobs and to taxes and wealth.
We can build 200,000 more homes than we do. If done like it is in France and Germany (where the builders build bigger better homes than the existing stock) then I would imagine the average price would be north of £300k
That is £60B added to GDP directly
Equal to over a million jobs and at least £20B off the deficit oer year
The untapped potential is larger than the north sea was at its peak. Its larger than all the car and aviation industry combined. Its just absurd that it is effective shackled and ignored0 -
floridaman wrote: »I thought high house prices made people richer and spend more money?
My understanding of this (the "wealth effect") is this:
In the short term when prices rise rapidly, people feel richer and spend more money, but more importantly release equity and spend it, providing a shot in the arm for an ailing economy. The purpose of QE was to create the price inflation, and one of the purposes of the interest rate cut would have been to encourage equity release.
In the medium term, once the equity is spent, it is spent, plus the same people must curb their spending since equity release is a loan which must be paid back with interest. Another of the purposes of the interest rate cut would have been to reduce the impact of this.
In the meantime, as prices rise, would be buyers curb their spending while they save a greater amount to be able to make a purchase. Again, interest rate cut to make the prices more affordable and crucially Help to Buy to bring purchases forward and stave the impact of this off for longer.
Ultimately, the wealth effect is temporary, and there may or may not be a net gain in the strength of the economy, depending on how long the effect lasts and whether the temporary boost in spending stimulates it enough to sustain prices at their elevated level after it wears off.0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »I'll be selling houses but keeping a house.
No need for tents...
I think it's a bear thing, it seems like they also like to camp in the woods too. Although I must admit that I am looking forward to taking my dog camping this summer with friends (I can't talk my wife into going camping, she likes her comfort too much), only for a weekend though)Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
QE was supported by some house price shoring tricks
"In the short term when prices rise rapidly, people feel richer and spend more money,"
QE: In the short term house prices rose rapidly, people did not feel richer and did not spend more money
There!
Fixed it.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards