We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
House Prices: New Record High - Nationwide +1% MoM +5.3%YoY
Comments
-
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Three points: -
1) They have in the past
2) Why can't they in the future
3) My point was they had not addressed the housing shortage. they could put in legislation or amends policies which promotes house building.
presumably the scottish government has no control over planning laws in scotland?0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »And just for CrashyTime....
Is Aberdeen still in the U.K. ?
I keep seeing that Scottish woman on the TV so I assumed she must have won :eek:'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0 -
-
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Three points: -
1) They have in the past
2) Why can't they in the future
3) My point was they had not addressed the housing shortage. they could put in legislation or amends policies which promotes house building.
In the post GFC era. The construction industry shed some 200,000 jobs. There is a shortage of skilled tradesman. Not least bricklayers now. To rebuild a workforce will take some years. In addition there's a shortage of production facilities to manufacture materials such as bricks and roof tiles. One brick manufacturer has only just recently used up it's stock piled bricks from 2008. As a consequence is investing again in ramping up production. Factories take time to construct and make operational.
If there isn't the climate post election for business to invest for the long term and training is given the neccessary focus to. Then the situation won't improve noticably. Governments can only provide the framework.
Post war was a very different era. With ex-serviceman seeking work. A far better equipped generation too. With far better level of skills.0 -
There is a shortage of skilled tradesman. Not least bricklayers now.
Surely european bricklayers will come over if their is work?
Like the polish plumbers did when we had a shortage.0 -
-
I thought there was high unemployment in Europe?
Typically (but not exclusively) those that come are without dependents.0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Why not try to stick to topic, which is the UK average house price.
In case you haven't noticed, the NOes won the vote and Scotland is still in the UK
So the Scottish situation is relevant and those in Aberdeen are of particular interest to all of us.
Presumably you don't know anything about the Scottish situation : no surprise there as you seem to know nothing about Scotland at all, but maybe some-one who knows Scotland can tell us whether the 'government' building 200,000 homes will affect Scotland?0 -
marathonic wrote: »If there really is a housing shortage, then prices must rise until builders simply cannot ignore the potential profits any more.
My question though is - where are all these people living that need the 1000's of houses you suggest we so desperately need? And by this, I mean people that could afford to buy the house if it was built - at current prices or even, for example, prices 20% below today.
about a million homes trade hands each year. The additional new builds will be sold into that very same market
typically what you find in more stable housing markets like france, is that the builders build big new homes and add supply to the top of the market
so a nice 4/5 bed detached new build home is built
someone buys that, selling often a smaller lessor home
That smaller lessor home is bought by someone, who themselves sold a smaller lessor home yet
etc
the people who will move into these homes are people in the current stock, we will live less dense. there was a good example in the 1970s when the population was completely flat for about 4 years in which time a million new homes were built. Those homes did not sit empty but allowed us to live less dense0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards