We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Fixed Cheaper than Tracker - Decisions, decisions
Options

marathonic
Posts: 1,786 Forumite


I recently moved to First Direct to their 1.29% + BOE lifetime tracker - currently 1.79%.
As of this morning, this has moved to 1.49% + BOE - currently 1.99%.
However, they've introduced the following fixed rates, which are fee-free for existing customers:
2-year: 1.49%
3-year: 1.89%
5-year: 2.29%
I'm really tempted by some of these.
I realize that the lifetime tracker is a good rate but am of the opinion that the margins will be similar, or perhaps lower, when the base rate starts to rise.
My mortgage is less than 2.5 times my salary so is well affordable and I could afford to save about a 20% overpayment over 2 years. With this in mind, I'm tempted to go for the two year product, save in regular savings accounts and high rate current accounts and, in 2-years, bring my mortgage down to a good bit less than 2 times my salary.
Has anyone any thoughts? Would you just stick it out with the tracker - which is currently 0.3% more expensive, getting more expensive as base rate rises between now and 2017.
As of this morning, this has moved to 1.49% + BOE - currently 1.99%.
However, they've introduced the following fixed rates, which are fee-free for existing customers:
2-year: 1.49%
3-year: 1.89%
5-year: 2.29%
I'm really tempted by some of these.
I realize that the lifetime tracker is a good rate but am of the opinion that the margins will be similar, or perhaps lower, when the base rate starts to rise.
My mortgage is less than 2.5 times my salary so is well affordable and I could afford to save about a 20% overpayment over 2 years. With this in mind, I'm tempted to go for the two year product, save in regular savings accounts and high rate current accounts and, in 2-years, bring my mortgage down to a good bit less than 2 times my salary.
Has anyone any thoughts? Would you just stick it out with the tracker - which is currently 0.3% more expensive, getting more expensive as base rate rises between now and 2017.
0
Comments
-
I recently moved to First Direct to their 1.29% + BOE lifetime tracker - currently 1.79%.
As of this morning, this has moved to 1.49% + BOE - currently 1.99%.
I'm curious how a life time tracker can move when the BoE rate hasn't moved.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards