Defence for those having their action stayed

TANZARELLI

Thanks updated the list above.

Palerie-head

Thanks for that Tanzarelli. I am at stage where judgement was awarded and I'm just keeping my fingers crossed that a stay can't be awarded after the judgement?

zippymice

I have recieved a letter from cheltenham couty court this morning stating

Upon it apearing that theissues raised in the test case, the office of fair tradingv nat west bank and others will affect this claim, the claim is stayed until further order with a view to awaiting the final decision (being judgementin the action or the final appellate court, whichever is the latter in the test case.

Is it worth trying to hae the stay lifted? and has anyone had their stay lifted yet?

Thanks

TANZARELLI

zippymice wrote: »

I have recieved a letter from cheltenham couty court this morning stating

Upon it apearing that theissues raised in the test case, the office of fair tradingv nat west bank and others will affect this claim, the claim is stayed until further order with a view to awaiting the final decision (being judgementin the action or the final appellate court, whichever is the latter in the test case.

Is it worth trying to hae the stay lifted? and has anyone had their stay lifted yet?

Thanks

Yes it is worth having the stay lifted and there are some pretty good templates being used on other site. As I am new to this particular site am not sure if there is any on here but I know www.consumercreditsupport.co.uk has as have others including www.penaltycharges.co.uk

Scotties_Mum

With regards to the court list, every court in Essex allocates to Southend County Court for the bank charge claims.

Therefore, courts such as Colchester would automatically transfer the case to Southend. (no other Essex court dealt with the bank charges claims other than Southend)

dreamylittledream

lindilou39 wrote: »

the ombudsmans decision isnt final anyway and depending on when you are claiming from its probably best to go through the courts or you risk being statute and barred.

A decision by an Ombudmsan is final and legally binding on both parties.

A 'view' by an adjudicator (the junior level of the FOS) is not.

Its irrelevant at the moment anyway as prior to the 27th the banks were offering to settle in full with interest before Ombudsman level and post 27th the service is not considering any complaints until the outcome of the test case.

meatloaf43154

sparky0107 wrote: »

Hi borgbaiter

Try giving this number a ring, 0845 345 4345. I spoke to a lady at St. Helens County Court, enquiring whether they were staying all cases, she said they were making a decision within a week. When I asked about getting the stay lifted, she said to speak to someone with more experience and gave me this number, it may be worth a try to get some clarification on the situation.

Good luck

The question is who is on the end of this number - is it some hidden experts?

Thanks

43154

sparky0107

Apparently they are something to do with the courts or are a helpline attatched to the system

tintinlostsnowy

just to let you know another one for your list
burnley combined courts are staying all claims now

deary65

sparky0107 wrote: »

Hi All,
Before you send in your letters to try to have the stay removed try ringing this number 0845 345 4345. A lady at St Helens County Court gave it to me, saying to speak to them as they are experts, before you send in any letters, going to try them myself later when I get to work.

Hope this helps

There are no experts when it comes to the law, the only consideration is the decision of the court, so sent you letters the more the better.


I have posted the following to assist you all come to some understanding as to how the law reasons.


As always with all legal matters of great constitutional importance, a journey in to history must be employed if the courts are to reach the right and just decision capable of binding us all. And that starting point, by its very nature, must begin with an understanding of the of conquest.


The conqueror in his address to the nation in 1066 in London, and in his “absolute possession” of all the lands of England by right of battle expressing his “will” for the future management of the nation. which fortunately for us all, was reduced to writing by his scribes specifically expressed to be so and stored in the tower of London together with the crown. This is the only written law which cannot be either amended or abolished for it is in fact the the kings last “will and testament” and therefore speaks from the grave. As a deeply religious person his victory at Hastings was deemed to be by way of define intervention, gods will,( witnessed by god) and that therefore the lands of England should be managed in accordance with that will.



Be under no illusions the matters in question to be litigated are of the up most importance for the nation, the government know this as to the banks the issue is not just money but the manner in which we are governed.