We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Identity checks
Options

WendellG
Posts: 38 Forumite
I've just been through the mortgage process and I thought the whole identity check thing was really painful. Firms just seem to be able to get you to jump through hoops just by mentioning FCA compliance.
For a single mortgage we had to do 3 identity checks with proof of identity and address. The first and easiest was the mortgage broker who accepted a scanned passport and driving license; next the lender who wanted an authenticated copy of the above (which we paid our GP to) and finally the lenders legal firm who had a very limited list of address verification options and we finally ended using the Council tax bill.
They would only accept verification from a solicitor, an employee of the lender (Santander) , or the Post Office verification service - and not the GP.
How can three organisations interpret what are presumably the same rules from the FCA in such very different ways?
For a single mortgage we had to do 3 identity checks with proof of identity and address. The first and easiest was the mortgage broker who accepted a scanned passport and driving license; next the lender who wanted an authenticated copy of the above (which we paid our GP to) and finally the lenders legal firm who had a very limited list of address verification options and we finally ended using the Council tax bill.
They would only accept verification from a solicitor, an employee of the lender (Santander) , or the Post Office verification service - and not the GP.
How can three organisations interpret what are presumably the same rules from the FCA in such very different ways?
0
Comments
-
I would expect the broker to take the original scans and then provide certified copies to the lender and solicitor in the great majority of cases - usually compulsory for the lender (although Natwest/RBS occasionally insist on branch visit if you didn't see broker face to face) and accepted by the very great majority of solicitors (we automatically send a message to the solicitor offering this by various delivery methods as soon as we know who they are).Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
-
As above, im surprised the broker did not takeoriginal copies - they could have then certified and forwarded those over to the lender and solicitor.I am a Mortgage AdviserYou should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0
-
Firms just seem to be able to get you to jump through hoops just by mentioning FCA compliance.
The multi million pound fines that the FCA keep dishing out are pretty good reason. Along with the reputational damage that failure brings in the media. Such as HSBC has suffered.For a single mortgage we had to do 3 identity checks with proof of identity and address. The first and easiest was the mortgage broker who accepted a scanned passport and driving license; next the lender who wanted an authenticated copy of the above (which we paid our GP to) and finally the lenders legal firm who had a very limited list of address verification options and we finally ended using the Council tax bill.
All three need are equally liable for money laundering checks. Hence why you are asked multiple times. There are no set rules on what is acceptable. Just guidelines. However, typically, you would expect them to be similar. In most cases, the lender and solicitor will take the broker certified copies. Although some solicitors can be fussy.How can three organisations interpret what are presumably the same rules from the FCA in such very different ways?
The FCA does not regulate solicitors.
They are not rules.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
The solicitor had a helpful FAQ and why they had to do their own check and not rely on the Santander check and guess what the FCA was to blame.0
-
But your broker could have done the job for all 3.
At the end of the day if sending off the same ID to 3 companies got you your house, is it really the end of the world?I am a Mortgage AdviserYou should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
My point was it was effectively 3 different IDs (x2) when you count the differences in requirements to get them verified, for the same thing, and each verification adds 3 days minimum to the processes
I'm probably paranoid about identity theft as any financial dealings seems to leave you wide open to it being abused.0 -
I do this on EVERY case - where clients use my solicitor.
Otherwise I do ID for myself and the lender.
Im sure other brokers are similar.
It sounds like you have a broker who does not do that - so its resulted in you doing a little more work.I am a Mortgage AdviserYou should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
The solicitor had a helpful FAQ and why they had to do their own check and not rely on the Santander check and guess what the FCA was to blame.
Not very helpful if they are not telling the truth.I do this on EVERY case - where clients use my solicitor.
Otherwise I do ID for myself and the lender.
Im sure other brokers are similar.
It sounds like you have a broker who does not do that - so its resulted in you doing a little more work.
My mortgage advisers do the same. provide the ID to the solicitor if our one is used but not if our solicitor is not used.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards