Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Milliband promises rent controls

11920222425

Comments

  • buglawton
    buglawton Posts: 9,246 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Yup we might be subject to a noisy, but only a caretaker administration for the next 5 years.
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    cells wrote: »
    .... A rent cap, in crude terms I think £1000 should be the max monthly rent in London and it should be less elsewhere. ...

    Stone me! Only a couple of days ago you wanted an £800pm cap in London. Now it's £1,000! That's a 25% increase in just two days! How much is it going to be by Christmas?:rotfl:

    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=68286166
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    edited 30 April 2015 at 9:27AM
    ukcarper wrote: »
    The way I understand it you don't have to increase rents by CPI but I'm sure some landlords will.
    I agree, however it it becomes the norm and acceptable that all tenancies are increased by CPI or RPI (whatever the plan), then it essentially changes the marketplace and could drive rents up for all.....

    The example of Germany would suggest is that is exactly what will happen, or as one person out it; "Our primary concern is that a system of rent indexations – as proposed by Labour – will only serve to encourage a culture of regular rental increases by providing the basis to legitimately escalate rents on a regular and sustainable basis."
    buglawton wrote: »
    Yes if this legislation comes to pass I will definitely change my letting policy from no in-tenancy increases to per-inflation annual increases. And I will explain exactly why to my tenants, even quoting the Act. It's simple protection of interests in an adverse situation.

    That is indeed the thing.

    The irony is that we have an announcement, specifically designed to generate headlines that would make a tenant think 'Oh look, Labour are going to stop my rent going up', that would actually result in the exact opposite being the case.
  • cells
    cells Posts: 5,246 Forumite
    antrobus wrote: »
    Stone me! Only a couple of days ago you wanted an £800pm cap in London. Now it's £1,000! That's a 25% increase in just two days! How much is it going to be by Christmas?:rotfl:

    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=68286166


    I think £800 but I was saying that's what the dear MP should have gone with as a round 1000
  • buglawton
    buglawton Posts: 9,246 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    antrobus wrote: »
    The example of Germany would suggest is that is exactly what will happen, or as one person out it; "Our primary concern is that a system of rent indexations – as proposed by Labour – will only serve to encourage a culture of regular rental increases by providing the basis to legitimately escalate rents on a regular and sustainable basis."



    That is indeed the thing.

    The irony is that we have an announcement, specifically designed to generate headlines that would make a tenant think 'Oh look, Labour are going to stop my rent going up', that would actually result in the exact opposite being the case.

    What Labour may have misjudged is, the dumbness needed to believe that headline policy will actually make renting easier and the motivation to go out & vote tactically may not coexist in the same brains.
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    cells wrote: »
    I think £800 but I was saying that's what the dear MP should have gone with as a round 1000

    So by somehow putting your own words into someone else's mouth you are avoiding any responsibility for what you say?:)

    And there was I getting the distinct impression that you were just pulling random numbers out of thin air.:rotfl:
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 30 April 2015 at 12:41PM
    antrobus wrote: »
    Stone me! Only a couple of days ago you wanted an £800pm cap in London. Now it's £1,000! That's a 25% increase in just two days! How much is it going to be by Christmas?:rotfl:

    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=68286166

    So what if you have a large family and want to rent? Or want to rent in the Centre of London?

    Hell, in Central London you can pay a grand a week for a 2 bed flat!

    http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-to-rent/property-47882071.html

    It's not even particularly big.
  • antrobus
    antrobus Posts: 17,386 Forumite
    Generali wrote: »
    So what if you have a large family and want to rent? Or want to rent in the Centre of London?

    Hell, in Central London you can pay a grand a week for a 2 bed flat!

    http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-to-rent/property-47882071.html

    It's not even particularly big.

    I don't believe there was any rational basis for either the figure of £800 or £1,000 a month.:)
  • ukcarper
    ukcarper Posts: 17,337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    antrobus wrote: »
    I don't believe there was any rational basis for either the figure of £800 or £1,000 a month.:)

    I wonder how those flats would be allocated.
  • cells
    cells Posts: 5,246 Forumite
    antrobus wrote: »
    I don't believe there was any rational basis for either the figure of £800 or £1,000 a month.:)


    £1k a month is almost exactly 1/3rd the gross take home average wage in London OR 44% of net pay after income taxes

    But the real rational of "the plan" is that it will force the country to fix its housing problem. Such a rent cap would actually result in more homes built in the mid to long term
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.