We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Milliband promises rent controls
Comments
-
Just put a cap on rents much easier much more effective.
£800 max per month London
£600 max elsewhere
Empty homes levy of £600pm too
very quickly the rental sector would shrink from its ~20% of the housing market to ~10%. Three million renters would become owners fairly rapidly0 -
Typical ignorant politicians idea.
Just get enough houses built and the problem will sort itself out.0 -
Just put a cap on rents much easier much more effective.
£800 max per month London
£600 max elsewhere
Empty homes levy of £600pm too
very quickly the rental sector would shrink from its ~20% of the housing market to ~10%. Three million renters would become owners fairly rapidly
It's probably true that if one makes letting less attractive some landlords will sell and so there will be an increase in owner occupation.
However, most owner occupiers tend to have lower number of people per property than renters (most owners don't go in for multiple occupancies whilst rental businesses do).
That would mean people without anywhere to live at all and not market forces to find a solution.
Presumably one would expect the state to step in and stop the people sleeping on the street.0 -
Maybe Ed will apply this to house sales as well;
Before you can sell at the market rate, you have to tell the buyer what you paid so the buyers are in a better position to explain why you should sell below market price.
.
You can find all of that information out on Zoopla in about 2 minutes.0 -
Ronaldo_Mconaldo wrote: »You can find all of that information out on Zoopla in about 2 minutes.
I think that was his point... Being able to find out what the last sale price was hasn't exactly put the brakes on HPI.0 -
This is wrong. Landlords should be free to set whatever rent they want as its their business - it should be driven by the free market. The idea of capping is presumably to combat the fact we don't have enough social housing and house prices are too high so people cant go down that route? People often seem trapped in rented because they don't have other options..... so maybe address this problem?
Sounds a bit sticky plaster to me.0 -
Just put a cap on rents much easier much more effective.
£800 max per month London
£600 max elsewhere
Empty homes levy of £600pm too
very quickly the rental sector would shrink from its ~20% of the housing market to ~10%. Three million renters would become owners fairly rapidly
When rent caps were removed effectively via the AST, the quality of rental properties went up markedly. If they are reinstated then by far the most likely outcome is quality goes back down.0 -
It actually makes reasonable sense. The expectation must be that interest rates will go up at some point, and - whilst professional landlords make provision for this - your amateur will attempt to pass this straight on to the tenant. I've seen it happen and it's not pretty.
I personally would introduce a 3 month notice period, where landlords need to give 3 months to the tenant if they intend to raise the rent. If they can't agree, tenant can walk away with no penalties.
Landlord can then market the property at what he/she defines as a fair rent. In-tenancy rises (subject to 3 months notice period) should be pegged to inflation.0 -
lawriejones1 wrote: »It actually makes reasonable sense. The expectation must be that interest rates will go up at some point, and - whilst professional landlords make provision for this - your amateur will attempt to pass this straight on to the tenant. I've seen it happen and it's not pretty.
I personally would introduce a 3 month notice period, where landlords need to give 3 months to the tenant if they intend to raise the rent. If they can't agree, tenant can walk away with no penalties.
Landlord can then market the property at what he/she defines as a fair rent. In-tenancy rises (subject to 3 months notice period) should be pegged to inflation.
You can't have rent controls without security of tenure.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards