Every Laugh Is The Energy

fairclaire

Tinyshoes wrote: »

:grouphug:

That was a bit insensitive of me.

Night hun, hope you have managed to get on ok sleeping in your bed again. xx

don't be daft

ETA I'm still not ready for a threesome

Savvybuyer

rockyrose wrote: »

You had better be posting about the election results savvy, i'm looking forward to it and after you dissect it and post, it all might make some sense to me because at the moment the only vibe I'm getting from the "main" 3 are increasing fear and desperation from all of them.

I doubt it'll be doing that - I have better things to do (such as just watch it all (...all?:eek: It's on all day Friday until 10pm!)). As for "vibes", I've been getting no vibes at all:o:o. Just can't see any of the body language that might be on TV.

Actually I've revised my position - though not who I am voting for - someone, who's more of an anorak than I am, will remember I said there was one grouping of parties that I felt would be a disaster (that's assuming there needs to be a grouping at all) - well, it turns out I've now become aware of the actual policy of the "lesser" party in that possible group and in fact it's policy is the opposite of what I thought and would, instead, be against the policy of the "bigger" party, so might stop them implementing that and that preventing them implementing such a policy is what I want. So, there don't seem to be any groupings anymore that I think would be a disaster. Hey, good news!:) I think if I be anarchial (can't spell, properly!) in all of this - personally I think they ought to all get stuck in a logjam and unable to pass anything at all - because all politicians do is make laws and there are already far too many laws! We now have a Fixed-Term Parliaments Act (yet another law:D), under which it might be a little more difficult to dissolve a Parliament and have another election, but we don't know: we shall see. Even if there were another election, it would likely produce a similar result anyway.

I do have a preference for a particular party of government though. I'm not voting for the previous incumbent to be MP because I like them particularly - after they annoyed me earlier in the year - but I am voting for them because of the party. That said, politicians from another party have annoyed me on the TV quite recently, to the extent that, if I were voting for them before, I certainly wouldn't be doing so now! Sometimes they say things that are just so plain wrong, that I find myself getting highly annoyed by them and have to switch them off! (:rotfl:) One of them did that last night (Tuesday) - just so wrong to take credit like that!(:mad:)

aau1

Chrisv wrote: »

Or HERE (yep, I'm bored lol)

Thanks, I seem to have flumped my original link fixed it now :beer:

Savvybuyer

fairclaire wrote: »

your PM box is full Mr popular :cool:

I know - I have a problem getting round to it and clearing it!:rotfl:

EDIT: I've created a space now, just for you! Might catch me if you're quick as I may still be around for a few minutes. Must go though - got a plan:D! Wake up later, go out to M relatively late on and then take all day till I get back, sort out the M list and then... gen. election day all day!:D:D:rotfl:

manila

emmita wrote: »

Its worth you tubing - I did. Think the purple is for aged, blue is if your hair is flat and gold for dull hair.

I tried the purple, not too impressed with the shampoo but the moisturiser was OK. Left hair a bit flyaway and hard to style but I will try again with less conditioner. I hammered it cos it felt stripped from the shampoo.

So after one use I will use this for work days when I wash and save the good stuff for weekends.

What is your good stuff then, if it's not a secret?

3Dogs

davemorton wrote: »

Okay, I know this thread is the font of all knowledge, and I also know I could google it, but dont want to..........so, I also know most dog breads had a purpose in life, at one point of other in time, so........what was the point of the sausage dog?? (Cant be bothered to work out how to spell their proper title, sorry, tired).
Generally interested.

They are that shape to wriggle into badger sets, as that is what they are badger hounds/terriers. The body probably wasn't as elongated originally but you know what dog breeders are, they breed to get the characteristics they want, not what is best for the health of the dog, and the dachshund now suffers badly from many spinal problems because of this. They are good diggers, with strong front legs/paws and good front strength too, with a broad chest. And the coat of the smooth one is like velvet, especially their ears BUT they are the most yappy dogs imaginable. I know several people who have fostered them and have said 'never again' :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

And no, that is not from Google :rotfl:

Savvybuyer

fairclaire wrote: »

your PM box is full Mr popular :cool:

I'm off - as I have to get up at some point during today (which would be delayed more if I stayed longer and longer!).

Goodbye for now!:wave:

itch_for_a_glitch

zippydooda wrote: »

got mine as well.

unfortunately though, it did not give me the one I accidently claimed for the 2nd time ;)

once on old and once on new.

still relieved I have the one I was due.

lol
Me too.

yra

A v T
old
1 x Walkers Crisps - Worcester Sauce (32.5g) £0.55 £0.55 - TCB 40p
1 x Seabrook Crinkle Cut Crisps - Beefy (6x25g) £0.97 £0.85 - Q/COS 20p...
1 x Seabrook Crinkle Cut Crisps - Cream Cheese & Chive... £0.97 £0.85
1 x Seabrook Crinkle Cut Crisps - Canadian Ham (6x25g) £0.97 £0.85

new
1x Walkers Worcester Sauce (32.5G) £0.55 N/A
1x Seabrook Beefy Flavour (6X25G) £0.97 N/A
1x Seabrook Cream Cheese & Chives Crisps (6X25G) £0.97 N/A
1x Seabrook Canadian Ham (6X25G) £0.97 N/A

Seabrooks were on offer on t.com until 5/5, might still work today (on old system) as price in store should still be 85p

dipdap

Just sneaking on to see if anyone wants to share my chips