📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Bond of Caution (Scotland)

As part of the Grant of Confirmation process for my dad's estate I have had to take out a Bond of Caution for the proceeds of the estate.

One condition of this is that I am not allowed to spend any of the money until 6 months after my dads passing and I have put the proceeds of his bank accounts in a seperate account.

As we will hopefully be able to start marketing the flat for sale soon, will we be able to use the cash we have from dad's accounts to pay the upfront marketing fees and the home report as well as the solicitors fee for doing the legal work on the estate or will we be expected to meet that cost from our own funds?

Comments

  • rpc
    rpc Posts: 2,353 Forumite
    Are you sure it says you cannot spend any money? More usually, the prohibition is on making any distributions.

    The six month bar is there to allow any creditors to appear or anyone who wants to challenge the appointment.

    Selling a house isn't a distribution so I would have thought it would be allowed. You could always call the insurer and ask.
  • Beancounter
    Beancounter Posts: 1,076 Forumite
    rpc wrote: »
    Are you sure it says you cannot spend any money? More usually, the prohibition is on making any distributions.

    The six month bar is there to allow any creditors to appear or anyone who wants to challenge the appointment.

    Selling a house isn't a distribution so I would have thought it would be allowed. You could always call the insurer and ask.

    Yeah, the word used was distribute but as I am the only beneficiary that amounts to the same thing.

    Were you saying that using the money I have from Dad's accounts for marketing the house etc will be allowed?
  • Savvy_Sue
    Savvy_Sue Posts: 47,432 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If in doubt, phone the insurance company issuing the bond.

    My reasoning would go that if there was going to be an eventual 'distribution' to more than one person, then the fact that there's only one of you receiving that distribution means you can use the money to pay legitimate expenses, just as you would if there was more than one of you.
    Signature removed for peace of mind
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.