We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
optional payment protection

Comments
-
is this the same as PPI
probablyhow does she go about stopping this and reclaiming it
She phones their complaint line and puts in her complaint and asks them to stop it at the same time.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
If she's struggling to pay it, why not actually claim on the insurance and also put in a financial hardship case to see if they will freeze interest? If she's missing the minimum she'll be trashing her credit record anyway so might as well plead hardship
Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
trouble is she is working but only part time,and she never realised that she was paying it not being to savvy financial wise0
-
trouble is she is working but only part time,and she never realised that she was paying it not being to savvy financial wise
The issue is point of sale. If she was part-time (under 16 hours) when she got the card they shouldn't have added PPI as it most likely won't cover her. If she got it when she was full time then it's largely irrelevant as it's sale that matters.
Not being savvy about finance doesn't mean a miss-sale unfortunately, it would be on every single credit card statement and admitting she never read them would mean she could have missed fraud going on.
A claim on the PPI to help her with payments may help or you could complain about miss-sale but you need stronger reasons than simply saying she didn't know she had it (anyone can claim that regardless of whether they read statements or not)Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards