We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
jeweller ruined valuable ring
Options

olias
Posts: 3,588 Forumite
I will try and be brief. My wife has recently developed angioedema which causes swelling and bloating, as a result her rings have become too tight and she has been unable to wear them. She has been extremely upset over this as not only are they very expensive, but have extreme sentimental value.
The rings are an engagement ring by a top designer bought for about £3500 and now sells for nearer £5000, a wedding ring from the same designer bought for about £600 and now selling for about £900 and an eternity ring bought for about £250.
The main unique thing about the two designer rings are that they are cast, have a slight stippled finish and have a completely circular cross section, a bit like a curtain ring. These were chosen as she has a horse and it was to help stop them getting caught on equipment and diging into her finger and stop muck getting trapped under them.
She went to a reputable, long standing local family jeweller who said he could get them resized.
On their return they had all, particularly the engagement ring been left with a flat, angular cross section with marks all over, an uneven profile and different width sections. They had obviously just been put on a ring cone and beaten with a hammer to stretch them. I understand now, they should have been cut and an extra bit of gold added to retain the profile and finish.
My wife is in tears and devastated and will not wear them. Where do i go from here? If i take them back to him, they could be damaged further, in fact i do not think they can be fixed without taking out the diamond and recasting a new ring which i do not believe he will do. The alternative is to go to small claims court, but then i will not have given him the chance to put it right.
Comments and advice please.... Thanks
Olias
The rings are an engagement ring by a top designer bought for about £3500 and now sells for nearer £5000, a wedding ring from the same designer bought for about £600 and now selling for about £900 and an eternity ring bought for about £250.
The main unique thing about the two designer rings are that they are cast, have a slight stippled finish and have a completely circular cross section, a bit like a curtain ring. These were chosen as she has a horse and it was to help stop them getting caught on equipment and diging into her finger and stop muck getting trapped under them.
She went to a reputable, long standing local family jeweller who said he could get them resized.
On their return they had all, particularly the engagement ring been left with a flat, angular cross section with marks all over, an uneven profile and different width sections. They had obviously just been put on a ring cone and beaten with a hammer to stretch them. I understand now, they should have been cut and an extra bit of gold added to retain the profile and finish.
My wife is in tears and devastated and will not wear them. Where do i go from here? If i take them back to him, they could be damaged further, in fact i do not think they can be fixed without taking out the diamond and recasting a new ring which i do not believe he will do. The alternative is to go to small claims court, but then i will not have given him the chance to put it right.
Comments and advice please.... Thanks
Olias
0
Comments
-
How much did the rings have to be resized by? If more than half a ring size, then the jeweler should cut it then "add" additional metal. Stretching should only be carried out on very small size increases.
Have you discussed it with the jeweller who did the work yet? Not sure if it can be rectified once over stretched...Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
Hi and thanks. Thats the point, i dont believe the ring is fixable without re casting which i am sure the jeweller will not do, therefore do i just go straight to the courts, or give them back to him to ruin furyher before then takingnit to the courts. It was resized by over 1/2 ring size.
I know i might seem as myself and my wife are overreacting, but this is nearly £6000 worth of jewellery and if i showed you pics of the original and what has been done you would see it is damaged beyond repair.
Olias0 -
before you start running straight to the courts have you spoken to the jeweler?
Small claims is meant to be the last resort if all communication/actions has broken down and I think you have to prove that you have tried to work it out.Thanks to money saving tips and debt repayments/becoming debt free I have been able to work and travel for the last 4 years visiting 12 countries and working within 3 of them. Currently living and working in Canada :beer: :dance:0 -
Hi and thanks. Thats the point, i dont believe the ring is fixable without re casting which i am sure the jeweller will not do, therefore do i just go straight to the courts, or give them back to him to ruin furyher before then takingnit to the courts. It was resized by over 1/2 ring size.
I know i might seem as myself and my wife are overreacting, but this is nearly £6000 worth of jewellery and if i showed you pics of the original and what has been done you would see it is damaged beyond repair.
Olias
How many sizes was the ring increased by?
You cannot go straight to court without discussing this with the jeweler.
Take the rings back (after taking images) and show the jeweler why you are unhappy, and agree what happens next. You need to give them chance to rectify the situation.
If you cannot come to any solution, go back to tbe original place you bought them, and get them to put in writing a quote of how much it will costoto fix.
THEN you can send the jeweler a 'letter before action' giving them a reasonable time to pay before you take court action.Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
PinkShoes is correct, you need to speak to the jeweller first, and before going to court would need to get evidence of what it will cost to rectify the error, and ideally, something from an expert confirming that the work done by the original jeweller was not acceptable or appropriate.All posts are my personal opinion, not formal advice Always get proper, professional advice (particularly about anything legal!)0
-
Have you spoken to the "designer" company?
Certainly Tiffany, Cartier etc all do things like resizing and repairs. Personally if there was some peculiar finish then I'd have probably gone to them in the first place but its a bit late for that.
You need to discuss with the jeweller first but it may be worth getting the view of the original manufacturers on the cost of repairing it as ultimately you would need this to make a claim.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards