CPS statement

enfield_freddy

http://www.combinedparkingsolutions.com/legal-issues/


Cases heard by higher courts in England are persuasive in Scotland but not binding on a Sheriff Court, Cases heard by the House of Lords are only binding if the case involved a Scottish legal issue.
The legal reference for a Scottish case is University of Edinburgh -v- Daniel Onifade [2005 S.L.T (Sh Ct) 63], heard before Sheriff Principal Iain Macphail QC – and the full legal text can be found at http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/sc514.html
This case found parking charges issued to be lawful and upheld the charges imposed.
Combined Parking often takes cases to court in scotland Click here for recent case detail.
and here is a copy of the decree.
For the avoidance of doubt and to negate question 2 as raised in the appeal, our signge only states “Parking Charge” and therefore the question of misrepresentation is not relevant.


gosh they really worry me


PS that is a copy/paste all speeling mistook are there's

waamo

This outfit does run a really good coffee shop though. I should do a Tripadvisor review at some point.

ampersand

........and send them an escalating invoice. £30 per star, £40 per 'modification'.

- and free coffee for Life.

Half_way

for one moment I thought this was a statement form the Crown Prosecution Service

waamo

ampersand wrote: »

........and send them an escalating invoice. £30 per star, £40 per 'modification'.

- and free coffee for Life.

Good idea. I could put up a sign on my table with contractual terms. By serving me you agree to the following.....

I'm partial to Perkys coffee and walnut cake. That and a latte.

HO87

Perky has banged on about this case for several years.

The findings of the court related solely to the matters at hand and they made no wider findings - not that they could. The truth is that Mr Onifade never disputed the fact that he owed the University money. He did, however, dispute the amounts.

BenefitMaster

enfield_freddy wrote: »

The legal reference for a Scottish case is University of Edinburgh -v- Daniel Onifade [2005 S.L.T (Sh Ct) 63]

Which is the equivalent of a County Court appeal in this country, so no more persuasive than the original Beavis ruling.

The Appeal Court judgments in McCafferty and Anderson are persuasive to the Scottish Summary Cause court.

IANAL - yet.