We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Why are Vanquis charging me £22.74 on a outstanding balance of £65?

13»

Comments

  • planteria
    planteria Posts: 5,322 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    so might J4M13 be wise to actually slightly overpay now, in advance of the next statement being produced?
    i'm not used to this situation, so i'm not sure:think:
  • Chrysalis
    Chrysalis Posts: 4,793 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    pvt wrote: »
    You're confusing what you paid back with what interest you paid. You always have to pay 100% of the loan back, even if the interest rate is 0%.

    In your case, for a loan at 40% APR over 60 months, you would have repaid 232% of the original amount, so a total of 132% total interest.

    I am not confused but it sounds like you are.

    I mean there is now a cap on payday loan providers that the interest cannot exceed 100% of the loan. Yet why is there no such cap on the banks?
  • PeacefulWaters
    PeacefulWaters Posts: 8,495 Forumite
    Chrysalis wrote: »
    I am not confused but it sounds like you are.

    I mean there is now a cap on payday loan providers that the interest cannot exceed 100% of the loan.
    You explained it terribly in your post.
    Yet why is there no such cap on the banks?
    Because most bank lending is medium-long term. Cap the interest at 100% and you close down access to credit over a term longer than three years for a large proportion of the population.
  • Chrysalis
    Chrysalis Posts: 4,793 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    so its ok to close down lending to the poor but not for the customers banks target?

    seems a tad unfair to me, but whatever :)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.