We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Moved into house to discover subsidence
Comments
-
What did the vendor say on the Property Information Form about subsidence? How long had they been in the place?
Yes, both you and the surveyor should have noticed this before now, but if the vendor's lied on the PIF...0 -
What did the vendor say on the Property Information Form about subsidence? How long had they been in the place?
Yes, both you and the surveyor should have noticed this before now, but if the vendor's lied on the PIF...
Just to add to this, if it's been obviously filled wouldn't this show that the vendors knew about it? I think you need to speak to your solicitor and ask their advice tbh, and tell them about the fact that it's been filled!
Also, all the posts saying you should have noticed/had a survey etc are utterly pointless, hindsight it a wonderful thing!0 -
If they've only been there a short time, they could easily argue that it wasn't them, must have been their predecessor...dirty_magic wrote: »Just to add to this, if it's been obviously filled wouldn't this show that the vendors knew about it?0 -
Thanks all for your replies some helpful advice, much appreciated.
Oddly enough the PIF doesn't mention subsidence and the section on whether the house had been underpinned was left blank? But I don't think it has though.
Previous owner had it since 2008, and I happened to find the photos on right move from back then and the garage looks perfectly square which would lead me to belief if was the previous owner?
We did have a subsidence search done actually after checking my paper work, but this looks like a standard thing, says a there is a potential moderate risk but no risks identified?
Thanks again0 -
I would say that you have got 2 options to pursue:
If monitoring pins have been fixed to the wall adjacent to the crack then unless they pre-date 2008 the vendor must have been aware that there was evidence of structural movement. Even if they do pre-date 2008 the vendor must surely have noticed them and therefore the cracking. Probably worth going back to your conveyancer to check what was declared by the vendor.
Secondly, you may have some recourse against the lender/valuation survey. As Silvercar correctly pointed out the lender/valuer can have a duty of care to you under certain circumstances and there have been cases in the past where purchasers have successfully claimed compensation.
Finally I would say don't panic just yet. A bit of cracking does not necessarily mean it is subsidence. It may just be some minor settlement or other minor structural movement that may not actually require any remedial work or only minor making good. Probably worth getting a structural engineer or building surveyor to have a look and give you some advice to see if it is worth pursuing.0 -
Great Advice thank you very much and have started along those lines.
Does the vendor have to declare structural movement? Or potential structural movement? Or only if asked?
Thanks again.0 -
Only if asked I believe.
It is not included in the standard Property Information Form other than guarantees for underpinning and general questions about building work. So it depends if your conveyancer asked any supplementary questions.
Conveyancing is not my thing so hopefully someone who actually knows what they are talking about will offer some advice.0 -
A further development has occurred in that I have now seen the valuation report and it states the property has NOT suffered from structural movement, which is obviously incorrect and therefore inaccurate.
Does anybody know the potential outcomes for this particular scenario? They have another surveyor coming around the house to revalue sometime this week, would appreciate some advice on what I should / could press for here?
Thanks again to everyone for the advice, much appreciated.0 -
I believe you have been missold. You'll be able to make a claim against the surveyor's firm for Professional Indemnity.
You'll need another independent report from a structural engineer but first speak to your bank.0 -
Thanks for your advice, would that still be the case if it's just the mortgage valuation? What exactly is a professional indemnity? Do you know what the potential outcomes are I.e best and worst case scenario? Apologies for all the questions and my ignorance here!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards