We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
FlashPark PCN
ianwillo
Posts: 10 Forumite
Hi All,
Theres lots of stuff on parking tickets so I'll be brief as I am just after some advice.
My partner uses my parents car, and we both parked on a road with FlashPark signs up. Subsiquently 2 Parking Charge Notice's were received. I was going to ignore both until I read the newbies thread. My challange is based on;
a). The sum does not represent a genuine pre-estimate of loss, nor is it a core price term. It is a disguised penalty and not commercially justified.
b). There is no evidence that you have any proprietary interest in the land.
c). There was no consideration nor acceptance flowing from both parties and any contract with myself, or the driver, is denied.
But, I have written this also which I have read on another thread. Does anyone think this is a good idea including in the letters, or not?
d); Flashpark has improperly requested the keepers personal data from the DVLA despite having neither issued a windscreen ticket nor used ANPR cameras.
Thanks all!
Theres lots of stuff on parking tickets so I'll be brief as I am just after some advice.
My partner uses my parents car, and we both parked on a road with FlashPark signs up. Subsiquently 2 Parking Charge Notice's were received. I was going to ignore both until I read the newbies thread. My challange is based on;
a). The sum does not represent a genuine pre-estimate of loss, nor is it a core price term. It is a disguised penalty and not commercially justified.
b). There is no evidence that you have any proprietary interest in the land.
c). There was no consideration nor acceptance flowing from both parties and any contract with myself, or the driver, is denied.
But, I have written this also which I have read on another thread. Does anyone think this is a good idea including in the letters, or not?
d); Flashpark has improperly requested the keepers personal data from the DVLA despite having neither issued a windscreen ticket nor used ANPR cameras.
Thanks all!
0
Comments
-
Flashpark are a mickey mouse self ticketing operation. For commission someone has taken some photos of yer car. The DVLA wont be bothered by the fact no ticket or ANPR is involved but send your letter. They will reject but must issue you with the code for popla where you will win with legal arguments0
-
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards