We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Subject Access Request - Tampered Call

2»

Comments

  • agarnett
    agarnett Posts: 1,301 Forumite
    InsideInsurance wrote: »
    ...Individual consumer complaints were not looked at by the FSA but by the Ombudsman and this continues to be true today.
    Individual insurance companies behaving badly can be named and shamed on MSE and will be looked at by MSE readers. The daily readership is enormous and it gets important stuff noticed.

    Name and shame this outfit please.
  • hubr
    hubr Posts: 23 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts
    rs65 wrote: »
    OP, don't do this. It may come back to bite you very hard.

    Plus, the Food Standards Agency will not be interested.

    Perhaps the Food Standards Agency isn't interested, but I think the Information Commissioner's office could be, under Principle 4
  • rs65
    rs65 Posts: 5,682 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    hubr wrote: »
    Perhaps the Food Standards Agency isn't interested, but I think the Information Commissioner's office could be, under Principle 4

    Did you read the post I quoted? They were suggesting lying about having a recording of the original call (and then incorrectly referred to FSA instead of FCA)
  • magpiecottage
    magpiecottage Posts: 9,241 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    rs65 wrote: »
    Did you read the post I quoted? They were suggesting lying about having a recording of the original call (and then incorrectly referred to FSA instead of FCA)
    Absolutely.

    The insurer has accused the OP of being dishonest.

    The last thing the OP wants to do is give them a demonstration that they really are dishonest.
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.
Update Your Picture