We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Sash windows to front of house

Sash windows are generally much more expensive than 'regular' uPVC windows.

To reduce cost, if sash windows were fitted only to the *front* of a mid-terraced house ('regular' uPVC frames to the rear) how do you think this would be perceived by potential purchasers in the future if I ever decide to sell my home?

Or is it better to simply stick to the 'regular' uPVC frames front and back? Will it seem less 'odd' since the frames are all the same?

Thanks!

Comments

  • arbrighton
    arbrighton Posts: 2,011 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    I'd find it odd to have different front and back personally
  • casper_g
    casper_g Posts: 1,110 Forumite
    Most period terraced houses I've seen are a mess of different extensions and add-ons at the back anyway, so I'd prioritise getting the fron to look good. That said, the best scenario would be to have the "right" windows all round.
  • DRP
    DRP Posts: 4,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    casper_g wrote: »
    Most period terraced houses I've seen are a mess of different extensions and add-ons at the back anyway, so I'd prioritise getting the fron to look good. That said, the best scenario would be to have the "right" windows all round.

    Ours early Edwardian terrace is exactly as described above:
    5x upvc sash and smart composite door at front and a scruffy old conservatory and standard upvc at back. All installed by the previous owners.

    Don't see anything wrong with the 'best' face at the front - builder/homowners have always done this. In fact the front of the house is beautiful stone and sandstone detail, whilst the back is very obviously a rougher type of stone with brick window details.

    We're in the planning stage for a rear extension- I have no intention of matching the front expensive sash and will be going for efficiency with the new doors/windows.
  • martinsurrey
    martinsurrey Posts: 3,368 Forumite
    Possom wrote: »
    Sash windows are generally much more expensive than 'regular' uPVC windows.

    To reduce cost, if sash windows were fitted only to the *front* of a mid-terraced house ('regular' uPVC frames to the rear) how do you think this would be perceived by potential purchasers in the future if I ever decide to sell my home?

    Or is it better to simply stick to the 'regular' uPVC frames front and back? Will it seem less 'odd' since the frames are all the same?

    Thanks!


    I wouldnt bother matching front and back.

    I would match left and right, ie, if the road is full of sash windows, get sash, so yours doesnt stand out!
  • Possom
    Possom Posts: 433 Forumite
    I would match left and right, ie, if the road is full of sash windows, get sash, so yours doesnt stand out!

    Well, the fact is that other houses all have 'regular' uPVC windows to the front.

    However, *originally* all the windows in the houses here were sash!
  • Doozergirl
    Doozergirl Posts: 34,082 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I would like to see the front with the correct proportions. The back doesn't matter so much to me.
    Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
  • arbrighton
    arbrighton Posts: 2,011 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    DRP wrote: »
    Don't see anything wrong with the 'best' face at the front - builder/homowners have always done this. In fact the front of the house is beautiful stone and sandstone detail, whilst the back is very obviously a rougher type of stone with brick window details.

    We're in the planning stage for a rear extension- I have no intention of matching the front expensive sash and will be going for efficiency with the new doors/windows.

    Unfortunately because of the position of our house, all sides are visible to the world and his wife, including passing narrowboats. We replaced the cr*p uPVC that our predecessors had put in with wooden double glazing with Georgian style bars, as it's in keeping with the house.
  • Seronera
    Seronera Posts: 343 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Seeing as you have to, a) live there b) look at it every day. I'd take the time to do what is right by the building from an architectural perspective. If it calls for sash windows then do sash. The material is your next choice.

    If you do it wrong you will always regret it and if you do it right you will soon forget the extra cost.

    We have an 1885 end terrace with a 1920s extension. The 1885 bit had sash windows and we replaced the originals with UPVC sliding sash about 20 years ago. The remainder of the building was never sliding sash and those windows have been replaced with appropriate replacements.

    You wouldn't want to see you gran in a mini skirt would you. Treat your property with the same respect and do whats appropriate.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.7K Life & Family
  • 259.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.