📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

S&S ISA - Investment Safety/Risks

Options
nxdmsandkaskdjaqd
nxdmsandkaskdjaqd Posts: 871 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
edited 17 March 2015 at 5:29PM in Savings & investments
I wanted to understand more about the security/safety/risks of investments held within a S&S ISA (no cash).

Having used my ISA allowance each year and now having to think about which financial institution I should place my pension pot (SIPP) in a year’s time. I am concerned that putting all of my eggs in one basket may be an error of judgement. I am currently with HL, I like their platform, and know how to use their processes.

I appreciate that everyone’s S&S ISA is ring fenced in a Trust, and that the FSCS is not applicable in this instance, so what are the risks of all of one’s assets being in one financial institution? Or am I being over cautious?

Comments

  • bowlhead99
    bowlhead99 Posts: 12,295 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Post of the Month
    You are probably being overcautious... but if HL have acted fraudulently or negligently in failing to ring fence your assets or in running off with the money then there is some non-zero risk that you could lose more than the 50k compensation limit.

    However, at year end they had £49.1bn assets under administration. If one of their senior managers fiddled the system to take £1bn out and run off to Brazil with it, overall the system would have lost 1/49th of its assets, and the actual recoverable assets do not match the total that should be ring fenced.

    Perhaps half of those £49bn assets are on the SIPP platform and unaffected while it was only the other platforms who took the £1bn hit, (i.e. ISA and unwrapped) and investors there including yourself lost 2/49ths of their assets instead of the overall 1/49th implied by the overall asset level.

    So if you think HL is going to lose a £billion of customer's assets through inadequate controls and mismanagement AND if 2/49ths of your assets are over £50,000 so wouldn't be covered by the FSCS, then it might be time to split up your assets amongst multiple providers.
  • Ifts
    Ifts Posts: 1,960 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Name Dropper
    edited 18 March 2015 at 2:47AM
    There was a 'Investor compensation schemes – are you covered?' write-up over on the Monevator blog that I posted on here a little while back:

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4853288
    Never let the perfume of the premium overpower the odour of the risk
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.