We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

New build con artists?

24

Comments

  • martinsurrey
    martinsurrey Posts: 3,368 Forumite
    pinkteapot wrote: »
    Tell them a polite but firm no. You've got your broker and solicitor lined up and will be using them. No further explanation required.

    and Linden can tell them "no, you're not, and refuse the offer"

    If this is a part exchange plot and Linden own it, they can say what they want, and you can walk away, its nothing to do with the person buying the Linden plot.

    (and that linked page is for the party part exchanging, not the person buying the house recieved in part exchange)
  • pinkteapot
    pinkteapot Posts: 8,044 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Did edit my post after seeing the point in the OP about T&Cs. Intrigued as to how they can be legal when estate agents can't force you to use particular companies.

    Couldn't find a Linden page about PX for purchasers - the link I gave was the only one I found. OP can tell us if they'd seen a different page.
  • martinsurrey
    martinsurrey Posts: 3,368 Forumite
    pinkteapot wrote: »
    Did edit my post after seeing the point in the OP about T&Cs. Intrigued as to how they can be legal when estate agents can't force you to use particular companies.

    Couldn't find a Linden page about PX for purchasers - the link I gave was the only one I found. OP can tell us if they'd seen a different page.


    It’s not illegal for the EA to force you (as far as I know), it’s just they just have no power to do so, as they don’t own the property, they can advise their client to not deal with you as it will hinder the sale, but at the end of the day it’s up to vendor to decide who they deal with.

    In this case the vendor is Linden, and they can ask what they like, OP can say no if they like.
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    First question I'd ask is "what's in it for me?" as the developer will be chucking incentives at their buyer to use particular brokers/solicitors, so why not at the buyer's buyer's if they are so anxious to maintain control?
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • martinsurrey
    martinsurrey Posts: 3,368 Forumite
    kingstreet wrote: »
    First question I'd ask is "what's in it for me?" as the developer will be chucking incentives at their buyer to use particular brokers/solicitors, so why not at the buyer's buyer's if they are so anxious to maintain control?

    the buyer of the Linden plot generates a profit and a plot sale in thier accounts, the buyer of the part exchange just clears thier balance sheet, much less in it for them to bother offering incentives.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    String them along a bit. Get them to send you brochures. Ask awkward questons. Put them to trouble/expense. Ask them to come and meet you somewhere to talk trhought the deal/contract then don't turn up.

    Then eventually tell them to take a hike.
  • Thanks all for your overwhelming responses. I didn't think I would get much help to be honest.

    Speaking to the estate agent today it looks like the house has been bought from the building company already. They are effectively putting money down for the couple as part of the new build they are buying.

    Linden homes are then using a company called the new homes group, who are acting on their behalf.

    My broker called the contact at the new homes group, and all she kept saying was "it's my clients request" he asked to speak to the client and she wouldn't give him a number as it was "the clients request" not to do so.

    We've spoken to the estate agent who are now a little frustrated as they have been pushed out the way, and now all the negotiations are going through this new company. The only instructions that the estate agent had was that if an offer under the asking price was accepted, then they would recommend for us to use their solicitor and broker.

    This doesn't apply to us as our offer was on the nose.

    So frustrating, I suppose the next step is to get in contact with the building company direct, pull out, or bow down to their demands.

    Seems very fishy

    Thanks everyone
  • To add to this, is not clear if the new Homes group have won the contract to deal with linden homes and are now thinking "let's push our broker/solicitor to them so we can make extra commission" The "clients request" ie linden homes could be a load of rubbish
  • pinkteapot
    pinkteapot Posts: 8,044 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 10 March 2015 at 1:29PM
    Ask to see a copy of the T&Cs that they mentioned for yourself. Try and get someone to put it in writing to you that you must use the people they say.

    If that fails, do you have a contact at Linden that you could speak to?

    It doesn't make sense for Linden (if they own the property now?) to make it this hard for people to buy the houses. Builders usually want to offload PX houses they've taken on ASAP!
  • westernpromise
    westernpromise Posts: 4,833 Forumite
    I don't even begin to understand this.

    Are you saying that you, party A, are "buying" a house from party B who has already contracted to part-exchange it with party C?

    If so, you cannot be buying the house from B. You're buying it from C (the builder). Presumably, the terms of the deal between B and C is that C must get at least £X net for the sale of B's house, otherwise B stumps up the difference? That would explain why B is still knocking himself out doing the marketing, and presumably is also funding the estate agent, even though he's not actually the vendor.

    It sounds to me like the builders want to secure the sale of their new-build house by offering part exchange deals, but the nasty string attached is the one whereby their buyers do all the work selling the part-exchange for them, and incur all the usual expenses they'd incur if there were no such p/x.

    It makes one wonder what the point of part-exchanging is. In essence, all it does is secure the new home buyer the new house, but at the cost of committing to paying the difference between its price and some agreed price for that of the house they are part exchanging. If the builder keeps stuffing up the process by insisting on their choice of solicitor, it exposes the part-exchange owner/vendor to the risk that they can't sell that house for X but they still owe the builder X. They are locked into the buy before they have completed the sell.

    It wouldn't work for me!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 246K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 259.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.