We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Parking Eye - Town Quay Southampton - Court Claim?

Hi all,

I'm hoping that you'll be able to help me with an ongoing saga relating to parking eye.

As part of the Beaulieu spring autojumble event in may last year I lent my classic van to an acquaintance who drove to Southampton to meet an friend at the red jet ferry terminal.

Five days later as the registered keeper I received a parking charge notice form a firm called parking eye. Which stated that the vehicle had stayed in the car park for 33 minutes. But at no time would it have been left unattended.

I appealed online via their website, outlining that I was not the registered keeper, but that I could not identify the driver. That I believed the charges where complety disproportionate.

The appeal was processed and I received a further request for a drivers details which I did not reply to as I was unable to supply the information. They mentioned a holding period for 14 days. The case then went quiet and I heard no more from parking eye.

The 35 day limit mentioned in the appeal paperwork came and went and I had assumed that they had canceled the charge.

I've recently been working abroad and have come home to a new pile of letters from parking eye more than 6 months since my last letter from them. The first new letter states that they are rejecting the appeal and supply details for sending the case to POPLA. However the time limit for doing this expired while I was away. The next letter is described as a LETTER BEFORE COURT CLAIM and talks of likely court proceeding should payment not be received.

I'm looking for advice about what to do next, I've not received any official court papers or anything like that. But equally I'm not sure simply waiting to receive them is a good idea? I don't have money to spend on legal advice so I'm a bit uncertain how to proceed.

Should I write to parking eye detailing what I will say in court to contest the case to see if they back down?

Your advice and thoughts are much appreciated.

Comments

  • DoaM
    DoaM Posts: 11,863 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    You sent in an appeal but did not receive any appeal response? (The "name the driver" letter is a prevarication stance they sometimes use - completely in contravention of the BPA code of practice).

    Complain to the BPA (email addresses in the NEWBIES thread). Copy that complaint to PE.

    Complain also to PE that they never responded to your appeal.
  • The letter received in January was to say they had rejected the appeal. it came more more than 6 months after the last message from them. Hence I had assumed the matter was closed and was a bit surprised to see them still trying to get the money.

    Does a 6 month delay go against bpa rules?
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    bear in mind this site had a lot of controversy last year and various people were investigating it, never mind court cases, so they may have placed it on hold during that period and maybe resurrected it afterwards
  • nigelbb
    nigelbb Posts: 3,823 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Bylaws apply to Town Quay therefore it's not relevant land for the proposes of POFA 2102. Only the driver can be chased for unpaid parking charges not the keeper https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4995553
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.